Quality Standards 4.2 Quality of Instructors

Quality Standards 4.2  Quality of Instructors

Quality Standards 4.2              Quality of Instructors

Quality Standards Type           Outcome

Quality Standards Description:

     Instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study must manage the curriculum according to the system and mechanism for management and instructor improvement and development to produce empirical results that can be seen from   qualified and quality instructors that are suitable for the curriculum/program and quality academic outputs.

     Quality of instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study result from well defined recruitment and appointment system, and instructor management and improvement and development system. Therefore directed degree qualification instructors, holding doctoral degree instructors, holding academic ranks instructors, and instructors with good quality academic outputs are in the curriculum/program appropriately.

Assessment criteria

      Curriculum management performance that showed the quality of instructors will be based on:

       Indicator 4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications which are classified into 3 sub-indicators:

                                 4.2.1-1 Direct degree qualification instructors,

                                 4.2.1-2 Holding doctoral degree instructors, and

                                 4.2.1-3 Holding academic ranks instructors.

        Indicator 4.2.2 Instructors Academic Outputs.

4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications

4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications

              4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification

              Calculation Formula

              1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (X / 5)*100 = Y

              2) Received score = (Y / 100)*5

– 100% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = 5 mark

               4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees

                 Assessment Criteria
                 Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees into a score of between 0 – 5.

                – Bachelors Degree Program
                  The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 20% or higher.
                – Masters Degree Program
                  The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.

                   Calculation Formula

                 1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (X / 5)*100 = Y

                 2) Received score = (Y / 20)*5        

– 20% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = 5 mark

                  Remark:
                  Doctoral Degree qualifications are defined as Level of qualifications awarded to a PhD Or qualifications equivalent to a doctorate degree according to the criteria for considering qualifications, the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. In the event that the educational background is adjusted, the educational background adjustment shall be counted within the academic year being assessed.

              4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks

            Assessment Criteria
            Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with academic rank into a score of between 0 – 5.
            – Bachelors Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.
            – Masters Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 80% or higher.

              Calculation Formula

              1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks  = (X / 5)*100 = Y

              2) Received score = (Y / 60)*5

– 60% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = 5 mark

4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)

4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)

     Assessment criteria

     Convert percentage of academic outputs  of the instructor responsible for the curriculum to a score between 0-5, with  20 percent or more of academic outputs  equal  score  5 (Bachelor Degree Level) and 40 percent or more of academic outputs  equal  score  5 (Master Degree Level and Graduate Diploma Level) .

     Calculation Formula

     – Bachelor degree level (20% of academic outputs = 5 marks)

1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y

2.Received score = (Y / 20)*5

     – Master degree and Graduate Diploma level (40% of academic outputs = 5 marks)

1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y

2.Received score = (Y / 40)*5 = 5

     Notes

1.Publications and works of instructors will be counted from the date of publication in national or international journals. Not counting from the date of acceptance.

2.Published articles must be in document or electronics full paper format.

3.Research outputs of instructors published in the assessment year are all counted.

4.Published articles can be weighted according to the quality of academic works as indicated in the table below.

Quality Levels of Academic Outputs

Weight Quality Level
0.20 – A full research/academic article published in proceedings of a national conference
0.40 – A full research/academic article published in the proceedings of an international conference.
– Output that was registered as a petty patent
0.60 – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 2 of the TCI database
0.80 – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database.  
1.00 – A research/academic article published in an international academic journal that is listed in an international database in the Civil Service Commission on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement, or the OHEC Regulations Regarding Criteria to Appraise Journals that Disseminate Academic Output of 2013.
– Output that was registered as a patent
– Academic service to society that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank
– Research granted by a national department/organization
– Discovery of new plant/animal species that has been registered
– Textbook/books or translated books that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank
– Textbook/book translated books that has passed assessment criteria for requesting academic rank, but
has not been used in an academic rank request – A research/academic article that is citeded in a national academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database or in an international journal listed in international database according to the Civil Service Commission on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement.

Operational Result

4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications

4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification

1.ผศ. อารีนาฏ แก้วแววน้อย

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
Bachelorกศ.บ.(อังกฤษ-คณิต)วิทยาลัยการศึกษาปทุมวัน2513
Masterศบ.ม.(การสอนภาษาอังกฤษ)มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ 2524
  • Academic Works
TitleName of JournalIndexYear
The Correlation of the 4P Language Teaching for Communication and the Competency in Using the English Language for Communication of the Second Year Students at St Theresa International College ThailandLinguistic Anthropology eJournal Vol 3, Issue 2, January 09, 2018 pp 1-5SSRN2560

2. ผศ. กาญจนา คูวัฒนศิริ

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
Bachelorกศ.บ.(ภาษาอังกฤษ)วิทยาลัยวิชาการศึกษาประสานมิตร2517
Masterอ.ม.(ภาษาศาสตร์)จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย2524
  • Academic Works
Title Name of Journal Index Year
The Correlation of the 4P Language Teaching for Communication and the Competency in Using the English Language for Communication of the Second Year Students at St Theresa International College ThailandLinguistic Anthropology eJournal Vol 3, Issue 2, January 09, 2018 pp 1-5SSRN2560

3. Ms. Emelyn Galon

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
BachelorB.Ed. (English)University of Rizal System, Philippines2547
MasterM.Ed. (Educational Administration)St Theresa International College, Thailand2553
  • Academic Works
Title Name of Journal Index Year
The Correlation of the 4P Language Teaching for Communication and the Competency in Using the English Language for Communication of the Second Year Students at St Theresa International College ThailandLinguistic Anthropology eJournal Vol 3, Issue 2, January 09, 2018 pp 1-5SSRN2560
The Participation of the Local Community in the Long-boat Racingof Klong 14 Community, Tumbol Buengsan, Ongkarak Sub-district, Nakhon NayokSt. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Vol.6, No.1 January-June 2020 pp 125-136SSRN2562
Applying The STEM Education To Develop A Curriculum For The Children’s Day CareTeachers Of Early Childhood Education In ThailandSolid State Technology Volume: 63 Issue: 6 Publication Year: 2020 pp 16013-16025SCOPUS 2563

4.Dr. Grace Calugan Bangasan

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
BachelorB.Sc.(General Science and English)St.Louis University, Baguio City, Philippines2525
MasterM.A. (Educational Management)St.Louis University, Baguio City, Philippines2532
DoctoralPh.D. (Educational Management)St.Louis University, Baguio City, Philippines2545
  • Academic Works
Title Name of Journal Index Year
The Correlation between the Using of English Language for Business Communication and Applying in e-Commerce of the Students in ThailandeBusiness & eCommerce eJournal Vol 10, Issue 37, October 24, 2018 pp 1-3SSRN2561
Bridging Social Issues and local Community through Service LearningAnthropology of Education eJournal Vol. 4 No. 15 Feb 25, 2019 pp 1-6SSRN2561
Diversity of Algae in the Nakhon Nayok Canal of ThailandIndian Journal of Natural Science Vol.9 Issue 53 April 2019 pp 16947-16957Thomson reuters2561

5. Dario Abdullah Mando

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
BachelorBEd-EnglishMSU- Philippines2548
MasterMEd-Educ AdminSTIC, Thailand2553
  • Academic Works
Title Name of Journal IndexYear
Relationship of Sport Tourism Management with the Appropriate Marketing Mixtures Usage for Sport Tourism:Case Study of Sport Club in Buriram Province,Environmental Anthropology eJournal Vol 2, No 181, December 19, 2017 pp 1-5SSRN2560
The application of STEM in education management for employment (Career Academies) in ThailandSolid State Technology
Volume: 64 Issue: 2 Publication Year: 2021
pp 6268-6275
SCOPUS20
21

………..Calculation………..

1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (5 / 5)*100 = 100

2) Received score = (100 / 100)*5 = 5 

…………………………………………………………………………………………..

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-15

 4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees

No.Name of the LecturerDegree
1. Dr. Grace Calugan Bangasan PhD

………..Calculation………..

1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (1 / 5)*100 = 20

2) Received score = (20 / 20)*5 =5

…………………………………………………………………………………………

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-25

4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks

No.Name of the LecturerAcademic Ranks
1 ผศ. อารีนาฏ แก้วแววน้อย Asst. Professor
2ผศ. กาญจนา คูวัฒนศิริ Asst. Professor

 ………..Calculation………..

1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks  = (2/ 5)*100 = 40

2) Received score = (40 / 60)*5 

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-33.33

Evidence

4.2.1.1 1. ผศ. อารีนาฏ แก้วแววน้อย
4.2.1.2 2. ผศ. กาญจนา คูวัฒนศิริ
4.2.1.3 3. Ms. Emelyn Galon
4.2.1.4 4. Dr. Grace Calugan Bangasan
4.2.1.5 5. Mr. Dario Mando
Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-15
4.2.1-25
4.2.1-33.33
Overall Average Score 4.2.14.44

4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)

  • Instructor Academic Outputs in 2020 Academic Year
No.TitleName of the LecturerName of JournalIndexWeight
1Applying The STEM Education To Develop A Curriculum For The Children’s Day CareTeachers Of Early Childhood Education In ThailandEmelyn F. Galon Solid State Technology Volume: 63 Issue: 6 Publication Year: 2020 pp 16013-16025SCOPUS1
2The application of STEM in education management for employment (Career Academies) in ThailandDario Abdullah MandoSolid State Technology
Volume: 64 Issue: 2 Publication Year: 2021
pp 6268-6275
SCOPUS1
3Qualities of language Teacher aand its Implication to Teacher Orientation Progrom Development Grace Calugan Bangasan Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, Volume 28, Issue 4, December 2020SCOPUS1

………..Calculation………..

1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (3/5)*100 = 60

2.Received score = (60 / 20)*5 = 5

……………………………………………………………………………………………

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.25

Evidence

4.2.2.1 Applying The STEM Education To Develop A Curriculum For The Children’s Day CareTeachers Of Early Childhood Education In Thailand Academic Outputs
( Emelyn F. Galon )
4.2.2.2 The application of STEM in education management for employment (Career Academies) in Thailand Academic Outputs
( Dario Abdullah Mando )
4.2.2.3 Qualities of language Teacher aand its Implication to Teacher Orientation Progrom Development Academic Outputs
( Grace Calugan Bangasan )
Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.14.44
4.2.25
Overall Average Score 4.24.72

Leave a Reply