Quality Standards 4.2 Quality of Instructors

Quality Standards 4.2  Quality of Instructors

Quality Standards 4.2              Quality of Instructors

Quality Standards Type           Outcome

Quality Standards Description:

     Instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study must manage the curriculum according to the system and mechanism for management and instructor improvement and development to produce empirical results that can be seen from   qualified and quality instructors that are suitable for the curriculum/program and quality academic outputs.

     Quality of instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study result from well defined recruitment and appointment system, and instructor management and improvement and development system. Therefore directed degree qualification instructors, holding doctoral degree instructors, holding academic ranks instructors, and instructors with good quality academic outputs are in the curriculum/program appropriately.

Assessment criteria

      Curriculum management performance that showed the quality of instructors will be based on:

       Indicator 4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications which are classified into 3 sub-indicators:

                                 4.2.1-1 Directed degree qualification instructors,

                                 4.2.1-2 Holding doctoral degree instructors, and

                                 4.2.1-3 Holding academic ranks instructors.

        Indicator 4.2.2 Instructors Academic Outputs.

4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications

4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications

              4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification

              Calculation Formula

              1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (5 / 5)*100 = 100

              2) Received score = (100 / 100)*5

– 100% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = 5 markS

               4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees

                 Assessment Criteria
                 Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees into a score of between 0 – 5.

                – Bachelors Degree Program
                  The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 20% or higher.
                – Masters Degree Program
                  The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.

                   Calculation Formula

                 1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (4 / 5)*100 = 80

                 2) Received score = (80 / 20)*5        = 20

– 20% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = 5 mark

                  Remark:
                  Doctoral Degree qualifications are defined as Level of qualifications awarded to a PhD Or qualifications equivalent to a doctorate degree according to the criteria for considering qualifications, the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. In the event that the educational background is adjusted, the educational background adjustment shall be counted within the academic year being assessed.

              4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks

            Assessment Criteria
            Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with academic rank into a score of between 0 – 5.
            – Bachelors Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.
            – Masters Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 80% or higher.

              Calculation Formula

              1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks  = (2 / 5)*100 = 40

              2) Received score = (40 / 60)*5 =3.33

– 60% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = 5 mark

4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)

4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)

     Assessment criteria

     Convert percentage of academic outputs  of the instructor responsible for the curriculum to a score between 0-5, with  20 percent or more of academic outputs  equal  score  5 (Bachelor Degree Level) and 40 percent or more of academic outputs  equal  score  5 (Master Degree Level and Graduate Diploma Level) .

     Calculation Formula

     – Bachelor degree level (20% of academic outputs = 5 marks)

1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (2/5)*100 = 40

2.Received score = (40 / 20)*5 = 10

     – Master degree and Graduate Diploma level (40% of academic outputs = 5 marks)

1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y

2.Received score = (Y / 40)*5 = 5

     Notes

1.Publications and works of instructors will be counted from the date of publication in national or international journals. Not counting from the date of acceptance.

2.Published articles must be in document or electronics full paper format.

3.Research outputs of instructors published in the assessment year are all counted.

4.Published articles can be weighted according to the quality of academic works as indicated in the table below.

Quality Levels of Academic Outputs

Weight Quality Level
0.20 – A full research/academic article published in proceedings of a national conference
0.40 – A full research/academic article published in the proceedings of an international conference.
– Output that was registered as a petty patent
0.60 – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 2 of the TCI database
0.80 – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database.  
1.00 – A research/academic article published in an international academic journal that is listed in an international database in the Civil Service Commission on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement, or the OHEC Regulations Regarding Criteria to Appraise Journals that Disseminate Academic Output of 2013.
– Output that was registered as a patent
– Academic service to society that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank
– Research granted by a national department/organization
– Discovery of new plant/animal species that has been registered
– Textbook/books or translated books that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank
– Textbook/book translated books that has passed assessment criteria for requesting academic rank, but
has not been used in an academic rank request – A research/academic article that is citeded in a national academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database or in an international journal listed in international database according to the Civil Service Commission on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement.

Operational Result

4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications

4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification

No. 1 (รศ. ดร.สันติ ศักดารัตน์ )

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
BachelorB.Sc. (Chemistry)มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์2517
MasterM.Sc.(Organic Chemistry)มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล 2519
DoctoralPh.D. Organic SynthesisUniversity of Glassgow. UK2522
  • Academic Works
TitleName of JournalIndexYear
A Study on the Effects of Compounds from Clinacanthus nutans on Dengue Virus Type2 InfectionIndian Journal of Natural Sciences Vol.7 Issue 42 June 2017 pp 12437-12442Thomson reuters2560
A Study on Effects of compounds from Alpinia officinarum Hance on antiviral activityIndian Journal of Natural Sciences Vol.9 Issue 53 April 2019 pp 17196-17204Thomson reuters2561
Applying The STEM Education To Develop A Curriculum For The Children’s Day CareTeachers Of Early Childhood Education In ThailandSolid State Technology Volume: 63 Issue: 6 Publication Year: 2020 pp 16013-16025SCOPUS2563

No. 2 (Dr. Hemant Kumar Singh )

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
BachelorB.Sc. (Honors (Physics))Banaras Hindu University, India2544
MasterM.Sc. (Physics)Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India2546
DoctoralPh.D. (Physics)Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, India2558
  • Academic Works
Title Name of Journal Index Year
Correlation between the Management of Necessary Learning Skills in the 21st Century and the Learning Skills of the Secondary School Students in ThailandStakeholder Management & Stakeholder Responsibilities eJournal
Vol 7, Issue 5, March 14, 2018 pp 1-6
SSRN2560
The Cause Source and Preventive Ways of PM2.5 Dust in Bangkok, ThailandTransport, Energy & Environment eJournal Vol 1, Issue 9, February 25, 2019 pp 1-5 SSRN2561

No. 3 ( Dr. Teresita R. Doctor )

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
BachelorB.Sc.(Biology)Bagulo College Foundation, Philippines2527
MasterM.A.(Education)University of the Cordilleras Bagulo City, Phillippines2535
DoctoralPh.D.(Management)University of the Cordilleras Bagulo City, Phillippines2549
  • Academic Works
Title Name of Journal Index Year
Physics Problem Solving Ability and Analytical Thinking Ability of Eleventh Grade Students by Applying 7E Learning Cycle Model.Anthropology of Education eJournal Vol 3, Issue 5, January 12, 2018 pp 1-5SSRN2560
Molluscicidal Performance of Kae Farang Gliciridia sepium, Jacqstrudel and Siam Weed Chromolaena odorata, Linn. Leaf Extracts on Golden Snail Pomacea caniculata Linn.Ecology eJournal Vol.3 No. 21 Jun 6 2019 pp 1-5SSRN2562
Factor Influencing the Adoption and Integration of ICT in Teaching among Foreign Teachers in Thailandi-manager’s Journal of Education Technology Vol 16 No 1 April – June 2019 pp ERIC2562

No. 4 ( รศ. ดร.บัญชา พนเจริญสวัสดิ์ )

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
Bachelorกศ.บ.(ฟิสิกส์)วิทยาลัยวิชาการศึกษาประสานมิตร, ประเทศไทย2513
Masterวท.ม.(นิวเลียร์ฟิสิกส์)จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย , ประเทศไทย2515
DoctoralDr.lng (Theoretical Solid State Physics)University of T rondheim, Norway2521
  • Academic Works
Title Name of Journal Index Year
Students Problem-Solving Difficulties and implications in Physics: An empirical study.Journal of Education and Practice Vol.8, No.14, 2017 pp 59-62ERIC2559
Modeling and Mapping Personal Learning Environment of Thai International Higher Education StudentsAsian Journal of Education and Training Vol 4 No 1 2018 pp 35-40SCOPUS2560
The Stem Education Management and the Learning in the 21st Century of Secondary School Students in ThailandChange Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal Vol 9, Issue 7, March 13, 2018 pp 1-3SSRN2560
Assessment of the Graduate Diploma in Teaching Profession Curriculum St Theresa International College, Nakhon Nayok , Thailand
Activity Log
St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Vol.6, No.1 January-June 2020 pp 188-210TCI 22562

No. 5 ( ผศ. อรุณี ศรีสวรรค์ )

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
Bachelorกศ.บ. (ฟิสิกส์-คณิต)วิทยาลัยวิชาการศึกษาปทุมวัน ประเทศไทย2514
Masterวศ.ม. (นิวเคลียร์เทคโนโลยี)จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย , ประเทศไทย2525
  • Academic Works
Title Name of Journal IndexYear
Physics Problem Solving Ability and Analytical Thinking Ability of Eleventh Grade Students by Applying 7E Learning Cycle Model.Anthropology of Education eJournal Vol 3, Issue 5, January 12, 2018 pp 1-5SSRN2560
The application of STEM in education management for employment (Career Academies) in ThailandSolid State Technology
Volume: 64 Issue: 2 Publication Year: 2021 pp 6268-6275
SCOPUS2563

………..Calculation………..

1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (5/ 5)*100 = 100

2) Received score = (100 / 20)*5  = 5

…………………………………………………………………………………………..

 

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-15

 4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees

No.Name of the LecturerDegree
1รศ. ดร.สันติ ศักดารัตน์Doctoral
2Dr. Hemant Kumar SinghDoctoral
3Dr. Teresita R. Doctor Doctoral
4รศ. ดร.บัญชา พนเจริญสวัสดิ์Doctoral

………..Calculation………..

1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (4/ 5)*100 = 80

2) Received score = ( 80/60 )*5 =5

…………………………………………………………………………………………

 

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-25

4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks

No.Name of the LecturerAcademic Ranks
1 Dr. Santi Sakdarat Associate Professor
2
Arunee SrisawanAssistant Professor

 ………..Calculation………..

1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks  = (2 / 5)*100 = 40

2) Received score = (40/ 60)*5  =3.33

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-33.33

Evidence

4.2.1.1 1. รศ. ดร. สันติ ศักดารัตน์
4.2.1.2 2. Dr. Hemant Kumar Singh
4.2.1.3 3. Dr. Teresita R. Doctor
4.2.1.4 4. รศ. ดร. บัญชา พนเจริญสวัสดิ์
4.2.1.5 5. ผศ. อรุณี ศรีสวรรค์
Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-15
4.2.1-25
4.2.1-33.33
Overall Average Score 4.2.14.44

4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)

  • Instructor Academic Outputs in 2020 Academic Year
No.TitleName of the LecturerName of JournalIndexWeight
1Applying The STEM Education To Develop A Curriculum For The Children’s Day CareTeachers Of Early Childhood Education In ThailandSanti Sakdarat Solid State Technology Volume: 63 Issue: 6 Publication Year: 2020 pp 16013-16025SCOPUS1
2The application of STEM in education management for employment (Career Academies) in ThailandArunee SrisanSolid State Technology
Volume: 64 Issue: 2 Publication Year: 2021
pp 6268-6275
SCOPUS1

………..Calculation………..

1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (2/5)*100 = 40

2.Received score = (40/ 40)*5= 5

……………………………………………………………………………………………

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.25

Evidence

4.2.2.1Academic Output No.1
4.2.2.2Academic Output No.2
Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.14.44
4.2.25
Overall Average Score 4.24.72

Leave a Reply