Quality Standards 4.2 Quality of Instructors

Quality Standards 4.2  Quality of Instructors

Quality Standards 4.2              Quality of Instructors

Quality Standards Type           Outcome

Quality Standards Description:

     Instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study must manage the curriculum according to the system and mechanism for management and instructor improvement and development to produce empirical results that can be seen from   qualified and quality instructors that are suitable for the curriculum/program and quality academic outputs.

     Quality of instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study result from well defined recruitment and appointment system, and instructor management and improvement and development system. Therefore directed degree qualification instructors, holding doctoral degree instructors, holding academic ranks instructors, and instructors with good quality academic outputs are in the curriculum/program appropriately.

Assessment criteria

      Curriculum management performance that showed the quality of instructors will be based on:

       Indicator 4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications which are classified into 3 sub-indicators:

                                 4.2.1-1 Directed degree qualification instructors,

                                 4.2.1-2 Holding doctoral degree instructors, and

                                 4.2.1-3 Holding academic ranks instructors.

        Indicator 4.2.2 Instructors Academic Outputs.

4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications

4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications

              4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification

              Calculation Formula

              1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (X / 5)*100 = Y

              2) Received score = (Y / 100)*5

– 100% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = 5 mark

               4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degree

                 Assessment Criteria
                 Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees into a score of between 0 – 5.

                – Bachelors Degree Program
                  The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 20% or higher.
                – Masters Degree Program
                  The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.

                   Calculation Formula

                             1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (X / 5)*100 = Y

                             2) Received score = (Y / 60)*5        

– 60% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = 5 mark

                  Remark:
                  Doctoral Degree qualifications are defined as Level of qualifications awarded to a PhD Or qualifications equivalent to a doctorate degree according to the criteria for considering qualifications, the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. In the event that the educational background is adjusted, the educational background adjustment shall be counted within the academic year being assessed.

              4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks

            Assessment Criteria
            Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with academic rank into a score of between 0 – 5.
            – Bachelors Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.
            – Masters Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 80% or higher.

              Calculation Formula

              1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks  = (X / 5)*100 = Y

              2) Received score = (Y / 80)*5

– 80% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = 5 mark

4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)

4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)

     Assessment criteria

     Convert percentage of academic outputs  of the instructor responsible for the curriculum to a score between 0-5, with  20 percent or more of academic outputs  equal  score  5 (Bachelor Degree Level) and 40 percent or more of academic outputs  equal  score  5 (Master Degree Level and Graduate Diploma Level) .

     Calculation Formula

     – Bachelor degree level (20% of academic outputs = 5 marks)

1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y

2.Received score = (Y / 20)*5

     – Master degree and Graduate Diploma level (40% of academic outputs = 5 marks)

1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y

2.Received score = (Y / 40)*5 = 5

     Notes

1.Publications and works of instructors will be counted from the date of publication in national or international journals. Not counting from the date of acceptance.

2.Published articles must be in document or electronics full paper format.

3.Research outputs of instructors published in the assessment year are all counted.

4.Published articles can be weighted according to the quality of academic works as indicated in the table below.

Quality Levels of Academic Outputs

Weight Quality Level
0.20 – A full research/academic article published in proceedings of a national conference
0.40 – A full research/academic article published in the proceedings of an international conference.
– Output that was registered as a petty patent
0.60 – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 2 of the TCI database
0.80 – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database.  
1.00 – A research/academic article published in an international academic journal that is listed in an international database in the Civil Service Commission on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement, or the OHEC Regulations Regarding Criteria to Appraise Journals that Disseminate Academic Output of 2013.
– Output that was registered as a patent
– Academic service to society that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank
– Research granted by a national department/organization
– Discovery of new plant/animal species that has been registered
– Textbook/books or translated books that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank
– Textbook/book translated books that has passed assessment criteria for requesting academic rank, but
has not been used in an academic rank request – A research/academic article that is citeded in a national academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database or in an international journal listed in international database according to the Civil Service Commission on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement.

Operational Result

4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications

4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct Degree Qualification

No. 1 รศ. ดร. อำพน ธรรมเจริญ (Assoc.Prof.Dr. Ampon Dhamachareon)

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
Bachelorคณิตศาสตร์วิทยาลัยวิชาการศึกษาประสานมิตรม ประเทศไทย2514
Master คณิตศาสตร์วิทยาลัยวิชาการศึกษาประสานมิตรม ประเทศไทย2516
MasterApplied MathematicsNorth Carolina State University, U.S.A. 2526
DoctorApplied MathematicsNorth Carolina State University, U.S.A.2529
  • Academic Works
TitleName of JournalIndexYear
Efficient Numerical Methods for Solving Differential Algebraic Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physic Vol. 04 No. 01 2016 pp 39-47 SCOPUS 2559
The Cause Source and Preventive Ways of PM2.5 Dust in Bangkok, ThailandTransport, Energy & Environment eJournal Vol 1, Issue 9, February 25, 2019 pp 1-5 SSRN2561
Factors Affecting Intention to Buy and Evaluation of Perceived Risks of E-Commerce Products eBusiness and eCommerce eJournal vol. 11 No. 35 05 jun 2019 SSRN2562
Factors Analysis For The Values In The Teaching Profession Of ThailandSolid State Technology Vol. 64 No. 1 (2021) pp 1862 – 1866SCOPUS2563

No. 2 ผศ. ดร. สมเจตน์ ไวยาการณ์ (Asst.Prof.Dr. Somjate Waiyakarn)

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
Bachelorคณิตศาสตร์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย ประเทศไทย2510
Masterสถิติประยุกต์สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์ ประเทศไทย2516
Doctorการวิจัยและพัฒนาหลักสูตรมหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒประสานมิตร ประเทศไทย2530
  • Academic Works
Title Name of Journal Index Year
Linking Work Integrated Learning and Competency of Graduates pursuing Graduate Diploma in Teaching Profession.Journal of Education and Practice Vol7, No 10 2016 pp 121-12ERIC2558
The Cause Source and Preventive Ways of PM2.5 Dust in Bangkok, ThailandTransport, Energy & Environment eJournal Vol 1, Issue 9, February 25, 2019 pp 1-5 SSRN2561
Factors Affecting Intention to Buy and Evaluation of Perceived Risks of E-Commerce Products eBusiness and eCommerce eJournal vol. 11 No. 35 05 jun 2019 SSRN2562
Factors Analysis For The Values In The Teaching Profession Of ThailandSolid State Technology Vol. 64 No. 1 (2021) pp 1862 – 1866SCOPUS2563

No. 3 ผศ. ดร. ศรัณย์ ว่องไว (Asst.Prof.Dr.Sarun Wongwai)

  • Educational backgrounds
DegreeMajorInstitutionYear
Bachelorคณิตศาสตร์วิทยาลัยครูสกลนคร ประเทศไทย2525
Masterการสอนคณิตศาสตร์มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่ ประเทศไทย2534
Doctorคณิตศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่ ประเทศไทย 2543
  • Academic Works
Title Name of Journal Index Year
Competency to Develop an Instructional Model Which Emphasizes the Abilities in Solving the Problems of the Teachers in the Scholarship Project of the Promotion of Science and Mathematics Talented Teachers (PSMT)Anthropology of Education eJournal Vol 2, Issue 62, May 10, 2017 pp 1-5SSRN2559
Modeling and Mapping Personal Learning Environment of Thai International Higher Education StudentsAsian Journal of Education and Training Vol 4 No 1 2018 pp 35-40SCOPUS2560
The Stem Education Management and the Learning in the 21st Century of Secondary School Students in ThailandChange Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal Vol 9, Issue 7, March 13, 2018 pp 1-3SSRN2560
The Trends of Aviation Business in the NewNormal Condition of ThailandSolid State Technology Volume: 63 Issue: 6 Publication Year: 2020 pp 16737-16747SCOPUS2563

………..Calculation………..

1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (3 / 3)*100 = 100

2) Received score = (100/ 100)*5  = 5

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-15

 4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees

No.Name of the LecturerDegree
1รศ. ดร. อำพน ธรรมเจริญ (Assoc.Prof.Dr. Ampon Dhamachareon) Doctoral
2ผศ. ดร. สมเจตน์ ไวยาการณ์ (Asst.Prof.Dr. Somjate Waiyakarn) Doctoral
3ผศ. ดร. ศรัณย์ ว่องไว (Asst.Prof.Dr.Sarun Wongwai) Doctoral

………..Calculation………..

1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (3 / 3)*100 = 100

2) Received score = (100 / 60)*5 = 5

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-25

4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks

No.Name of the LecturerAcademic Ranks
1 รศ. ดร. อำพน ธรรมเจริญ (Assoc.Prof.Dr. Ampon Dhamachareon) Associate Professor
2 ผศ. ดร. สมเจตน์ ไวยาการณ์ (Asst.Prof.Dr. Somjate Waiyakarn) Assistant Professor
3 ผศ. ดร. ศรัณย์ ว่องไว (Asst.Prof.Dr.Sarun Wongwai) Assistant Professor

 ………..Calculation………..

1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks  = (3/ 3)*100 = 100

2) Received score = (100 / 80)*5 =8

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-35

Evidence

4.2.1.1 รศ. ดร. อำพน ธรรมเจริญ (Assoc.Prof.Dr. Ampon Dhamachareon) CV
Research
4.2.1.2 ผศ. ดร. สมเจตน์ ไวยาการณ์ (Asst.Prof.Dr. Somjate Waiyakarn) CV
Research
4.2.1.3 ผศ. ดร. ศรัณย์ ว่องไว (Asst.Prof.Dr.Sarun Wongwai) CV
Research
Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.1-15
4.2.1-25
4.2.1-35
Overall Average Score 4.2.15

4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)

  • Instructor Academic Outputs in 2020 Academic Year
No.TitleName of the LecturerName of JournalIndexWeight
1The Trends of Aviation Business in the NewNormal Condition of ThailandSarun Wongwai Solid State Technology Volume: 63 Issue: 6 Publication Year: 2020 pp 16737-16747 SCOPUS1.00
2Factors Analysis For The Values In The Teaching Profession Of Thailand1.Ampon Dhamacharoen

2.Somjate Waiyakarn
Solid State Technology Vol. 64 No. 1 (2021) pp 1862 – 1866SCOPUS1.00

………..Calculation………..

1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (2/3)*100 = 66.67%

2.Received score = (66.67/ 40)*5 = 5

Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.25

Evidence

4.2.2.1 The Trends of Aviation Business in the NewNormal Condition of Thailand Academic Outputs
(Sarun Wongwai )
4.2.2.2 Factors Analysis For The Values In The Teaching Profession Of Thailand Academic Outputs
1.(Ampon Dhamacharoen)
2.(Somjate Waiyakarn)
Self-AssessmentScore
4.2.15
4.2.25
Overall Average Score 4.25

Leave a Reply