Quality Standards 4.2 Quality of Instructors
Quality Standards 4.2 Quality of Instructors
Quality Standards Type Outcome
Quality Standards Description:
Instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study must manage the curriculum according to the system and mechanism for management and instructor improvement and development to produce empirical results that can be seen from qualified and quality instructors that are suitable for the curriculum/program and quality academic outputs.
Quality of instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study result from well defined recruitment and appointment system, and instructor management and improvement and development system. Therefore directed degree qualification instructors, holding doctoral degree instructors, holding academic ranks instructors, and instructors with good quality academic outputs are in the curriculum/program appropriately.
Assessment criteria
Curriculum management performance that showed the quality of instructors will be based on:
Indicator 4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications which are classified into 3 sub-indicators:
4.2.1-1 Direct degree qualification instructors,
4.2.1-2 Holding doctoral degree instructors, and
4.2.1-3 Holding academic ranks instructors.
Indicator 4.2.2 Instructors Academic Outputs.
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (X / 5)*100 = Y
2) Received score = (Y / 100)*5
– 100% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = 5 mark
4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees
Assessment Criteria
Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees into a score of between 0 – 5.
– Bachelors Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 20% or higher.
– Masters Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (X / 5)*100 = Y
2) Received score = (Y / 20)*5
– 20% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = 5 mark
Remark:
Doctoral Degree qualifications are defined as Level of qualifications awarded to a PhD Or qualifications equivalent to a doctorate degree according to the criteria for considering qualifications, the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. In the event that the educational background is adjusted, the educational background adjustment shall be counted within the academic year being assessed.
4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks
Assessment Criteria
Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with academic rank into a score of between 0 – 5.
– Bachelors Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.
– Masters Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 80% or higher.
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = (X / 5)*100 = Y
2) Received score = (Y / 60)*5
– 60% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = 5 mark
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
Assessment criteria
Convert percentage of academic outputs of the instructor responsible for the curriculum to a score between 0-5, with 20 percent or more of academic outputs equal score 5 (Bachelor Degree Level) and 40 percent or more of academic outputs equal score 5 (Master Degree Level and Graduate Diploma Level) .
Calculation Formula
– Bachelor degree level (20% of academic outputs = 5 marks)
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y
2.Received score = (Y / 20)*5
– Master degree and Graduate Diploma level (40% of academic outputs = 5 marks)
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y
2.Received score = (Y / 40)*5 = 5
Notes
1.Publications and works of instructors will be counted from the date of publication in national or international journals. Not counting from the date of acceptance.
2.Published articles must be in document or electronics full paper format.
3.Research outputs of instructors published in the assessment year are all counted.
4.Published articles can be weighted according to the quality of academic works as indicated in the table below.
Quality Levels of Academic Outputs
| Weight | Quality Level |
| 0.20 | – A full research/academic article published in proceedings of a national conference |
| 0.40 |
–
A full research/academic article published in the proceedings of an
international conference. – Output that was registered as a petty patent |
| 0.60 | – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 2 of the TCI database |
| 0.80 | – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database. |
| 1.00 |
–
A research/academic article published in an international academic journal
that is listed in an international database in the Civil Service Commission
on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement, or the OHEC Regulations
Regarding Criteria to Appraise Journals that Disseminate Academic Output of
2013. – Output that was registered as a patent – Academic service to society that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank – Research granted by a national department/organization – Discovery of new plant/animal species that has been registered – Textbook/books or translated books that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank – Textbook/book translated books that has passed assessment criteria for requesting academic rank, but has not been used in an academic rank request – A research/academic article that is citeded in a national academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database or in an international journal listed in international database according to the Civil Service Commission on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement. |
Operational Result
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification
1.ผศ. อารีนาฏ แก้วแววน้อย
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | กศ.บ.(อังกฤษ-คณิต) | วิทยาลัยการศึกษาปทุมวัน | 2513 |
| Master | ศบ.ม.(การสอนภาษาอังกฤษ) | มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ | 2524 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| The Correlation of the 4P Language Teaching for Communication and the Competency in Using the English Language for Communication of the Second Year Students at St Theresa International College Thailand | Linguistic Anthropology eJournal Vol 3, Issue 2, January 09, 2018 pp 1-5 | SSRN | 2560 |
| Factors Affecting English Self-Efficacy According to the CEFR of Students at St Theresa International College, Thailand | Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 9863-9870 (May. 2022) | Scopus | 2564 |
2. ผศ. กาญจนา คูวัฒนศิริ
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | กศ.บ.(ภาษาอังกฤษ) | วิทยาลัยวิชาการศึกษาประสานมิตร | 2517 |
| Master | อ.ม.(ภาษาศาสตร์) | จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย | 2524 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| The Correlation of the 4P Language Teaching for Communication and the Competency in Using the English Language for Communication of the Second Year Students at St Theresa International College Thailand | Linguistic Anthropology eJournal Vol 3, Issue 2, January 09, 2018 pp 1-5 | SSRN | 2560 |
| Rehabilitation for Depression Among High School Students Using Group Activity Program in Schools in Bangkok, Thailand | Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 9854-9862 (May. 2022) | Scopus | 2564 |
3. Ms. Emelyn Galon
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | B.Ed. (English) | University of Rizal System, Philippines | 2547 |
| Master | M.Ed. (Educational Administration) | St Theresa International College, Thailand | 2553 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| The Correlation of the 4P Language Teaching for Communication and the Competency in Using the English Language for Communication of the Second Year Students at St Theresa International College Thailand | Linguistic Anthropology eJournal Vol 3, Issue 2, January 09, 2018 pp 1-5 | SSRN | 2560 |
| The Participation of the Local Community in the Long-boat Racingof Klong 14 Community, Tumbol Buengsan, Ongkarak Sub-district, Nakhon Nayok | St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Vol.6, No.1 January-June 2020 pp 125-136 | SSRN | 2562 |
| Applying The STEM Education To Develop A Curriculum For The Children’s Day CareTeachers Of Early Childhood Education In Thailand | Solid State Technology Volume: 63 Issue: 6 Publication Year: 2020 pp 16013-16025 | SCOPUS | 2563 |
4.Dr. Grace Calugan Bangasan
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | B.Sc.(General Science and English) | St.Louis University, Baguio City, Philippines | 2525 |
| Master | M.A. (Educational Management) | St.Louis University, Baguio City, Philippines | 2532 |
| Doctoral | Ph.D. (Educational Management) | St.Louis University, Baguio City, Philippines | 2545 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| The Correlation between the Using of English Language for Business Communication and Applying in e-Commerce of the Students in Thailand | eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal Vol 10, Issue 37, October 24, 2018 pp 1-3 | SSRN | 2561 |
| Bridging Social Issues and local Community through Service Learning | Anthropology of Education eJournal Vol. 4 No. 15 Feb 25, 2019 pp 1-6 | SSRN | 2561 |
| Diversity of Algae in the Nakhon Nayok Canal of Thailand | Indian Journal of Natural Science Vol.9 Issue 53 April 2019 pp 16947-16957 | Thomson reuters | 2561 |
5. Dario Abdullah Mando
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | BEd-English | MSU- Philippines | 2548 |
| Master | MEd-Educ Admin | STIC, Thailand | 2553 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Relationship of Sport Tourism Management with the Appropriate Marketing Mixtures Usage for Sport Tourism:Case Study of Sport Club in Buriram Province, | Environmental Anthropology eJournal Vol 2, No 181, December 19, 2017 pp 1-5 | SSRN | 2560 |
| The application of STEM in education management for employment (Career Academies) in Thailand | Solid State Technology Volume: 64 Issue: 2 Publication Year: 2021 pp 6268-6275 | SCOPUS | 20 21 |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (5 / 5)*100 = 100
2) Received score = (100 / 100)*5 = 5
…………………………………………………………………………………………..
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-1 | 5 |
4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees
| No. | Name of the Lecturer | Degree |
| 1. | Dr. Grace Calugan Bangasan | PhD |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (1 / 5)*100 = 20
2) Received score = (20 / 20)*5 =5
…………………………………………………………………………………………
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-2 | 5 |
4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks
| No. | Name of the Lecturer | Academic Ranks |
| 1 | ผศ. อารีนาฏ แก้วแววน้อย | Asst. Professor |
| 2 | ผศ. กาญจนา คูวัฒนศิริ | Asst. Professor |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = (2/ 5)*100 = 40
2) Received score = (40 / 60)*5
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-3 | 3.33 |
Evidence
| 4.2.1.1 | 1. ผศ. อารีนาฏ แก้วแววน้อย |
| 4.2.1.2 | 2. ผศ. กาญจนา คูวัฒนศิริ |
| 4.2.1.3 | 3. Ms. Emelyn Galon |
| 4.2.1.4 | 4. Dr. Grace Calugan Bangasan |
| 4.2.1.5 | 5. Mr. Dario Mando |
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-1 | 5 |
| 4.2.1-2 | 5 |
| 4.2.1-3 | 3.33 |
| Overall Average Score 4.2.1 | 4.44 |
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
- Instructor Academic Outputs in 2021 Academic Year
| No. | Title | Name of the Lecturer | Name of Journal | Index | Weight |
| 1 | Factors Affecting English Self-Efficacy According to the CEFR of Students at St Theresa International College, Thailand | Piyada Wattanasan Vipa Pengsa-ium Wilailak Tangcharaen Areenat Kaewwaewnoi Siriwan Tanyong | Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 9796 (May. 2022) | SCOPUS | 1 |
| 2 | Rehabilitation for Depression Among High School Students Using Group Activity Program in Schools in Bangkok, Thailand | Vichian Puncreobutr Kanchana Koowatthanasiri Sarun Wongwai Sirikorn Suthawatnatcha | Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 9796 (May. 2022) | SCOPUS | 1 |
………..Calculation………..
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (2/5)*100 = 40
2.Received score = (40 / 20)*5 = 10 = 5
……………………………………………………………………………………………
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.2 | 5 |
Evidence
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1 | 4.44 |
| 4.2.2 | 5 |
| Overall Average Score 4.2 | 4.72 |