Quality Standards 4.2 Quality of Instructors
Quality Standards 4.2 Quality of Instructors
Quality Standards Type Outcome
Quality Standards Description:
Instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study must manage the curriculum according to the system and mechanism for management and instructor improvement and development to produce empirical results that can be seen from qualified and quality instructors that are suitable for the curriculum/program and quality academic outputs.
Quality of instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study result from well defined recruitment and appointment system, and instructor management and improvement and development system. Therefore directed degree qualification instructors, holding doctoral degree instructors, holding academic ranks instructors, and instructors with good quality academic outputs are in the curriculum/program appropriately.
Assessment criteria
Curriculum management performance that showed the quality of instructors will be based on:
Indicator 4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications which are classified into 3 sub-indicators:
4.2.1-1 Directed degree qualification instructors,
4.2.1-2 Holding doctoral degree instructors, and
4.2.1-3 Holding academic ranks instructors.
Indicator 4.2.2 Instructors Academic Outputs.
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (X / 5)*100 = Y
2) Received score = (Y / 100)*5
– 100% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = 5 mark
4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees
Assessment Criteria
Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees into a score of between 0 – 5.
– Bachelors Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 20% or higher.
– Masters Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (X / 5)*100 = Y
2) Received score = (Y / 20)*5
– 20% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = 5 mark
Remark:
Doctoral Degree qualifications are defined as Level of qualifications awarded to a PhD Or qualifications equivalent to a doctorate degree according to the criteria for considering qualifications, the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. In the event that the educational background is adjusted, the educational background adjustment shall be counted within the academic year being assessed.
4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks
Assessment Criteria
Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with academic rank into a score of between 0 – 5.
– Bachelors Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.
– Masters Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 80% or higher.
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = (X / 5)*100 = Y
2) Received score = (Y / 60)*5
– 60% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = 5 mark
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
Assessment criteria
Convert percentage of academic outputs of the instructor responsible for the curriculum to a score between 0-5, with 20 percent or more of academic outputs equal score 5 (Bachelor Degree Level) and 40 percent or more of academic outputs equal score 5 (Master Degree Level and Graduate Diploma Level) .
Calculation Formula
– Bachelor degree level (20% of academic outputs = 5 marks)
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y
2.Received score = (Y / 20)*5
– Master degree and Graduate Diploma level (40% of academic outputs = 5 marks)
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y
2.Received score = (Y / 40)*5 = 5
Notes
1.Publications and works of instructors will be counted from the date of publication in national or international journals. Not counting from the date of acceptance.
2.Published articles must be in document or electronics full paper format.
3.Research outputs of instructors published in the assessment year are all counted.
4.Published articles can be weighted according to the quality of academic works as indicated in the table below.
Quality Levels of Academic Outputs
| Weight | Quality Level |
| 0.20 | – A full research/academic article published in proceedings of a national conference |
| 0.40 |
–
A full research/academic article published in the proceedings of an
international conference. – Output that was registered as a petty patent |
| 0.60 | – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 2 of the TCI database |
| 0.80 | – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database. |
| 1.00 |
–
A research/academic article published in an international academic journal
that is listed in an international database in the Civil Service Commission
on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement, or the OHEC Regulations
Regarding Criteria to Appraise Journals that Disseminate Academic Output of
2013. – Output that was registered as a patent – Academic service to society that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank – Research granted by a national department/organization – Discovery of new plant/animal species that has been registered – Textbook/books or translated books that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank – Textbook/book translated books that has passed assessment criteria for requesting academic rank, but has not been used in an academic rank request – A research/academic article that is citeded in a national academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database or in an international journal listed in international database according to the Civil Service Commission on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement. |
Operational Result
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification
No. 1 Dr. Dwiptendra Bandyopadhyay
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | Mathematics | University of Calcutta | 1985 |
| Master | Pure Mathematics | University of Calcutta | 1987 |
| Doctorate | Pure Mathematics | University of Calcutta | 1998 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| General Integral Transform – its Convergence and Consequences | Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. c SPM –ISSN-2175-1188 on line SPM: www.spm.uem.br/bspm doi:10.5269/bspm.51690 | Scopus | 2022 |
No. 2 Dr. Safiqul Islam
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | Mathematics | University of Calcutta | 1998 |
| Master | Applied Mathematics | Netaji Subhas Open University | 2010 |
| Doctorate | Applied Mathematics (Science) | Jadavpur University | 2014 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Wormhole solutions in embedding class-1 spacetime | International Journal of Modern Physics A Vol. 36, No. 2 (2021) 2150015 | Scopus | 2021 |
| A Reissner-Nordstrom+Λ Black Hole In The Friedman-Roberstson-Walker Universe | Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation | TCI2 | 2021, |
| Gravitational model of compact spherical Reissner-Nordström-type star under f (R, T ) gravity | Journal of Dynamical Systems & Geometric Theories | Scopus | 2021 |
| Thai connections to Nobel and Science Prizes Scientific Voyage | 2021 |
No. 3 Dr. Melven Acasio Morales
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | Mathematics | Misamis University | 1998 |
| Master | MAEd-Math Education | Misamis University | 2002 |
| Doctorate | EdD-Educational Management | Misamis University | 2005 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Excellent Math Teachers through the Eyes of Future Math Teachers: Basis for Developing a New Paradigm | St Theresa Journal | TCI2 | 2020 |
| Correlation between the Open Approach Teaching in Mathematics and the Critical Thinking of First Year Students of St Theresa International College, Thailand | Cognition in Mathematics, Science, & Technology eJournal Vol 9, Issue 47, December 19, 2017 pp 1-2 | SSRN | 2560 |
No. 4 Siriwan Tanyong
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | ศ.บ. (การคลัง) | มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง | 2524 |
| Master | ค.ม. (การวัดและการประเมินผลการศึกษา) | จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย | 2531 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Understanding Personal Learning Environment Perspectives of Thai International Tourism and Hospitality Higher Education Students. | Journal of Education and Practice Vol7, No10 2016 pp 128-139 | ERIC | 2558 |
| A Study on Simulation Methods in Academic Success with Reference to Teaching Biology for Education | Journal of Education and Practice Vol.7, No.11 April 2016 pp 164-168 | ERIC | 2558 |
| Prevention of Accidents and Risk Factors of Road Safety of School Buses in the Capital City and in the Suburbs of Thailand | Journal of Education and Practice Vol.7, No.11 April 2016 pp 164-168 | SSRN | 2559 |
Three Types of Educational Research: Comparison and Contrast | St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Vol.6, No.1 January-June 2020 pp 231-251 | TCI2 | 2562 |
Management Ability in Discovery Museum Tourism Case Study on Pak Phli Museum, the Phuan People, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand | St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Vol.6, No.2 July-December 2020 pp 70-79 | TCI2 | 2563 |
| A Model of Health Care Service Arrangement in a Medium-Sized Hotel to Hospitel | Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 1122-1131 (Apr. 2022) | SCOPUS | 2564 |
| Factors Affecting English Self-Efficacy According to the CEFR of Students at St Theresa International College, Thailand | Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 9796 (May. 2022) | SCOPUS | 2564 |
No. 5 Payap Sriyanonphinit
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | กศ.บ. (คณิตศาสตร์) | มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ | 2525 |
| Master | ศศ.ม. (คณิตศาสตร์ศึกษา) | มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง | 2555 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Applying The STEM Education To Develop A Curriculum For The Children’s Day CareTeachers Of Early Childhood Education In Thailand | Solid State Technology Volume: 63 Issue: 6 Publication Year: 2020 pp 16013-16025 | Scopus | 2020 |
| The Correlation Between Playground Management and the Safety in the Primary School, Pathumthani Province, Thailand | Educational Organization eJournal Vol 2, Issue 3, January 10, 2019 pp 1-3 | SSRN | 2019 |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (5 / 5)*100 = 100
2) Received score = (100 / 100)*5 = 5
…………………………………………………………………………………………..
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-1 | 5 |
4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees
| No. | Name of the Lecturer | Degree |
| 1 | Dr. Dwiptendra Bandyopadhyay | PhD |
| 2 | Dr. Safiqul Islam | PhD/Post Doc |
| 3 | Dr. Melven Acasio Morales | EdD |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (3 / 5)*100 = 60
2) Received score = (60 / 20)*5 = 15 = 5
…………………………………………………………………………………………
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-2 | 5 |
4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks
| No. | Name of the Lecturer | Academic Ranks |
| 1 | – | – |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = (0 / 5)*100 = 0
2) Received score = (0 / 60)*5 = 0
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-3 | 0 |
Evidence
| 4.2.1.1 | 1. Dr. Islam Safiqul |
| 4.2.1.2 | 2. Dr. Morales Melven Acasio |
| 4.2.1.3 | 3. Dr. Bandyopadhyay Dwiptendra |
| 4.2.1.4 | 4. อาจารย์ศิริวรรณ ตันย้ง |
| 4.2.1.5 | 5. อาจารย์พยัพ ศรียานนท์พินิจ |
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-1 | 5 |
| 4.2.1-2 | 5 |
| 4.2.1-3 | 0 |
| Overall Average Score 4.2.1 | 3.33 |
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
- Instructor Academic Outputs in 2021 Academic Year
| No. | Title | Name of the Lecturer | Name of Journal | Index | Weight |
| 1 | A Model of Health Care Service Arrangement in a Medium-Sized Hotel to Hospitel | Siriwan Tanyong | Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 1122-1131 (Apr. 2022) | SCOPUS | 1 |
| 2 | Factors Affecting English Self-Efficacy According to the CEFR of Students at St Theresa International College, Thailand | Siriwan Tanyong | Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 9796 (May. 2022) | SCOPUS | 1 |
………..Calculation………..
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (2/5)*100 = 40
2.Received score = (40 / 20)*5 = 10 = 5
……………………………………………………………………………………………
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.2 | 5 |
Evidence
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1 | 3.33 |
| 4.2.2 | 5 |
| Overall Average Score 4.2 | 4.17 |