Quality Standards 4.2 Quality of Instructors
Quality Standards 4.2 Quality of Instructors
Quality Standards Type Outcome
Quality Standards Description:
Instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study must manage the curriculum according to the system and mechanism for management and instructor improvement and development to produce empirical results that can be seen from qualified and quality instructors that are suitable for the curriculum/program and quality academic outputs.
Quality of instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study result from well defined recruitment and appointment system, and instructor management and improvement and development system. Therefore directed degree qualification instructors, holding doctoral degree instructors, holding academic ranks instructors, and instructors with good quality academic outputs are in the curriculum/program appropriately.
Assessment criteria
Curriculum management performance that showed the quality of instructors will be based on:
Indicator 4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications which are classified into 3 sub-indicators:
4.2.1-1 Directed degree qualification instructors,
4.2.1-2 Holding doctoral degree instructors, and
4.2.1-3 Holding academic ranks instructors.
Indicator 4.2.2 Instructors Academic Outputs.
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (5 / 5)*100 = 100
2) Received score = (100 / 100)*5
– 100% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = 5 markS
4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees
Assessment Criteria
Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees into a score of between 0 – 5.
– Bachelors Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 20% or higher.
– Masters Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (4 / 5)*100 = 80
2) Received score = (80 / 20)*5 = 20
– 20% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = 5 mark
Remark:
Doctoral Degree qualifications are defined as Level of qualifications awarded to a PhD Or qualifications equivalent to a doctorate degree according to the criteria for considering qualifications, the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. In the event that the educational background is adjusted, the educational background adjustment shall be counted within the academic year being assessed.
4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks
Assessment Criteria
Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with academic rank into a score of between 0 – 5.
– Bachelors Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.
– Masters Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 80% or higher.
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = (2 / 5)*100 = 40
2) Received score = (40 / 60)*5 =3.33
– 60% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = 5 mark
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
Assessment criteria
Convert percentage of academic outputs of the instructor responsible for the curriculum to a score between 0-5, with 20 percent or more of academic outputs equal score 5 (Bachelor Degree Level) and 40 percent or more of academic outputs equal score 5 (Master Degree Level and Graduate Diploma Level) .
Calculation Formula
– Bachelor degree level (20% of academic outputs = 5 marks)
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (2/5)*100 = 40
2.Received score = (40 / 20)*5 = 10
– Master degree and Graduate Diploma level (40% of academic outputs = 5 marks)
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y
2.Received score = (Y / 40)*5 = 5
Notes
1.Publications and works of instructors will be counted from the date of publication in national or international journals. Not counting from the date of acceptance.
2.Published articles must be in document or electronics full paper format.
3.Research outputs of instructors published in the assessment year are all counted.
4.Published articles can be weighted according to the quality of academic works as indicated in the table below.
Quality Levels of Academic Outputs
| Weight | Quality Level |
| 0.20 | – A full research/academic article published in proceedings of a national conference |
| 0.40 |
–
A full research/academic article published in the proceedings of an
international conference. – Output that was registered as a petty patent |
| 0.60 | – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 2 of the TCI database |
| 0.80 | – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database. |
| 1.00 |
–
A research/academic article published in an international academic journal
that is listed in an international database in the Civil Service Commission
on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement, or the OHEC Regulations
Regarding Criteria to Appraise Journals that Disseminate Academic Output of
2013. – Output that was registered as a patent – Academic service to society that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank – Research granted by a national department/organization – Discovery of new plant/animal species that has been registered – Textbook/books or translated books that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank – Textbook/book translated books that has passed assessment criteria for requesting academic rank, but has not been used in an academic rank request – A research/academic article that is citeded in a national academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database or in an international journal listed in international database according to the Civil Service Commission on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement. |
Operational Result
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification
No. 1 (รศ. ดร.สันติ ศักดารัตน์ )
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | B.Sc. (Chemistry) | มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์ | 2517 |
| Master | M.Sc.(Organic Chemistry) | มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล | 2519 |
| Doctoral | Ph.D. Organic Synthesis | University of Glassgow. UK | 2522 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| A Study on the Effects of Compounds from Clinacanthus nutans on Dengue Virus Type2 Infection | Indian Journal of Natural Sciences Vol.7 Issue 42 June 2017 pp 12437-12442 | Thomson reuters | 2560 |
| A Study on Effects of compounds from Alpinia officinarum Hance on antiviral activity | Indian Journal of Natural Sciences Vol.9 Issue 53 April 2019 pp 17196-17204 | Thomson reuters | 2561 |
| Applying The STEM Education To Develop A Curriculum For The Children’s Day CareTeachers Of Early Childhood Education In Thailand | Solid State Technology Volume: 63 Issue: 6 Publication Year: 2020 pp 16013-16025 | SCOPUS | 2563 |
No. 2 (Dr. Hemant Kumar Singh )
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | B.Sc. (Honors (Physics)) | Banaras Hindu University, India | 2544 |
| Master | M.Sc. (Physics) | Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India | 2546 |
| Doctoral | Ph.D. (Physics) | Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, India | 2558 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Correlation between the Management of Necessary Learning Skills in the 21st Century and the Learning Skills of the Secondary School Students in Thailand | Stakeholder Management & Stakeholder Responsibilities eJournal Vol 7, Issue 5, March 14, 2018 pp 1-6 | SSRN | 2560 |
| The Cause Source and Preventive Ways of PM2.5 Dust in Bangkok, Thailand | Transport, Energy & Environment eJournal Vol 1, Issue 9, February 25, 2019 pp 1-5 | SSRN | 2561 |
| The Development of Thailand’s Local Wisdom on Low-Fat Krayasart (Thai Sweet Cereal Bar) Products, Developed by Local Product Groups in Nakhon Nayok for Commercial Purposes | Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 1140-1150 (Apr. 2022) | SCOPUS | 2564 |
No. 3 ( Dr. Teresita R. Doctor )
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | B.Sc.(Biology) | Bagulo College Foundation, Philippines | 2527 |
| Master | M.A.(Education) | University of the Cordilleras Bagulo City, Phillippines | 2535 |
| Doctoral | Ph.D.(Management) | University of the Cordilleras Bagulo City, Phillippines | 2549 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Physics Problem Solving Ability and Analytical Thinking Ability of Eleventh Grade Students by Applying 7E Learning Cycle Model. | Anthropology of Education eJournal Vol 3, Issue 5, January 12, 2018 pp 1-5 | SSRN | 2560 |
| Molluscicidal Performance of Kae Farang Gliciridia sepium, Jacqstrudel and Siam Weed Chromolaena odorata, Linn. Leaf Extracts on Golden Snail Pomacea caniculata Linn. | Ecology eJournal Vol.3 No. 21 Jun 6 2019 pp 1-5 | SSRN | 2562 |
| Factor Influencing the Adoption and Integration of ICT in Teaching among Foreign Teachers in Thailand | i-manager’s Journal of Education Technology Vol 16 No 1 April – June 2019 pp | ERIC | 2562 |
No. 4 ( รศ. ดร.บัญชา พนเจริญสวัสดิ์ )
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | กศ.บ. เกียรตินิยม (ฟิสิกส์) | วิทยาลัยวิชาการศึกษาประสานมิตร, ประเทศไทย | 2513 |
| Master | วท.ม.(นิวเลียร์ฟิสิกส์) | จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย , ประเทศไทย | 2515 |
| Doctoral | Dr.lng (Theoretical Solid State Physics) | University of T rondheim, Norway | 2521 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Students Problem-Solving Difficulties and implications in Physics: An empirical study. | Journal of Education and Practice Vol.8, No.14, 2017 pp 59-62 | ERIC | 2559 |
| Modeling and Mapping Personal Learning Environment of Thai International Higher Education Students | Asian Journal of Education and Training Vol 4 No 1 2018 pp 35-40 | SCOPUS | 2560 |
| The Stem Education Management and the Learning in the 21st Century of Secondary School Students in Thailand | Change Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal Vol 9, Issue 7, March 13, 2018 pp 1-3 | SSRN | 2560 |
| Assessment of the Graduate Diploma in Teaching Profession Curriculum St Theresa International College, Nakhon Nayok , Thailand Activity Log | St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Vol.6, No.1 January-June 2020 pp 188-210 | TCI 2 | 2562 |
No. 5 ( ผศ. อรุณี ศรีสวรรค์ )
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | กศ.บ. (ฟิสิกส์-คณิต) | วิทยาลัยวิชาการศึกษาปทุมวัน ประเทศไทย | 2514 |
| Master | วศ.ม. (นิวเคลียร์เทคโนโลยี) | จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย , ประเทศไทย | 2525 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Physics Problem Solving Ability and Analytical Thinking Ability of Eleventh Grade Students by Applying 7E Learning Cycle Model. | Anthropology of Education eJournal Vol 3, Issue 5, January 12, 2018 pp 1-5 | SSRN | 2560 |
| The application of STEM in education management for employment (Career Academies) in Thailand | Solid State Technology Volume: 64 Issue: 2 Publication Year: 2021 pp 6268-6275 | SCOPUS | 2563 |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (5/ 5)*100 = 100
2) Received score = (100 / 20)*5 = 5
…………………………………………………………………………………………..
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-1 | 5 |
4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees
| No. | Name of the Lecturer | Degree |
| 1 | รศ. ดร.สันติ ศักดารัตน์ | Doctoral |
| 2 | Dr. Hemant Kumar Singh | Doctoral |
| 3 | Dr. Teresita R. Doctor | Doctoral |
| 4 | รศ. ดร.บัญชา พนเจริญสวัสดิ์ | Doctoral |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (4/ 5)*100 = 80
2) Received score = ( 80/20 )*5 =5
…………………………………………………………………………………………
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-2 | 5 |
4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks
| No. | Name of the Lecturer | Academic Ranks |
| 1 | Dr. Santi Sakdarat | Associate Professor |
| 2 | Arunee Srisawan | Assistant Professor |
| 3 | ดร.บัญชา พนเจริญสวัสดิ์ | รองศาสตราจารย์ |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = (3 / 5)*100 = 60
2) Received score = (60/ 60)*5 =5
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-3 | 5 |
Evidence
| 4.2.1.1 | 1. รศ. ดร. สันติ ศักดารัตน์ |
| 4.2.1.2 | 2. Dr. Hemant Kumar Singh |
| 4.2.1.3 | 3. Dr. Teresita R. Doctor |
| 4.2.1.4 | 4. รศ. ดร. บัญชา พนเจริญสวัสดิ์ |
| 4.2.1.5 | 5. ผศ. อรุณี ศรีสวรรค์ |
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-1 | 5 |
| 4.2.1-2 | 5 |
| 4.2.1-3 | 5 |
| Overall Average Score 4.2.1 | 5 |
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
- Instructor Academic Outputs in 2020 Academic Year
| No. | Title | Name of the Lecturer | Name of Journal | Index | Weight |
| 1 | The Development of Thailand’s Local Wisdom on Low-Fat Krayasart (Thai Sweet Cereal Bar) Products, Developed by Local Product Groups in Nakhon Nayok for Commercial Purposes | Arunwaratchaya Bayolsineesayom Jiratana Kriwong Kingkeaw Sangpaew Hemant Kumar Singh | Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 1140-1150 (Apr. 2022) | SCOPUS | 1 |
………..Calculation………..
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (1/5)*100 = 20
2.Received score = (20/ 20)*5= 5
……………………………………………………………………………………………
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.2 | 5 |
Evidence
| 4.2.2.1 | The Development of Thailand’s Local Wisdom on Low-Fat Krayasart (Thai Sweet Cereal Bar) Products, Developed by Local Product Groups in Nakhon Nayok for Commercial Purposes |
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1 | 5 |
| 4.2.2 | 5 |
| Overall Average Score 4.2 | 5 |