Quality Standards 2.1 Graduates Quality
Quality Standards 2.1 Graduates Quality
Quality Standards Type Outcome
Description
Instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study or activity organizers should manage the curriculum or organize various activities for learners to gain academic and professional proficiency, and the expected qualifications as specified in the curriculum which are accepted by stakeholders or graduate users. The curriculum/program of study should manage to produce quality graduates who occupy learning outcomes of Thailand qualifications framework for Higher Education, higher education standards. It is also believed that the graduates of the curriculum / program of study can apply knowledge and skills to their job performance suit for the 21st century skills.
Curriculum performance can reflect the quality of the graduates considering from the satisfaction of graduates users with regard to learning outcomes, learner outcomes, and their skills in job performance suitable for the 21st century skills.
Assessment Criteria for Indicator 2.1
Average score for indicator 2.1 is from the average score of 3 sub-indicators: 2.1.1 the satisfaction of graduates users with regard to learning outcomes, 2.1.2 the satisfaction of graduates users with regard to learner outcomes, and 2.1.3 the satisfaction of graduates users with regard to their skills in job performance suitable for the 21st century skills. The average is a score between 0 – 5
2.1.1 Aspect of Learning Outcomes in accordance with the Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education.
Quality Standards Description
The Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (TQF) has established the preferred characteristics of graduates that are set forth in curricular documents (TQF 2) and which cover at least 5 aspects of learning outcomes as follows. 1)Ethical and moral development 2)Knowledge 3)Cognitive skills 4)Interpersonal skills and responsibility and 5) Analytical and communication skills. This indicator assesses graduate quality from the point of view of graduate users.
Curriculum performance can reflect the quality of the graduates considering from the satisfaction of graduates users with regard to learning outcomes.
Assessment Criteria
The average assessment score of graduates (full score of 5)
Formula for Calculation
Score = Sum of Graduate Assessment Scores
Total Number of Graduates Assessed
Notes:
1) Number of graduates evaluated by graduate users must not be less than 20% of the total number of graduates.
2) Satisfaction evaluation of Self-employed graduates will not be considered.
3) In case of international programs, the 20% will be considered from the total number of Thai students in that program.
4) In case of improved curriculum that still has no graduates, the results of the previous performance will be used.
5) Number of learning domains outcomes used in the assessment are as specified in the curriculum.
2.1.2 3 Aspects of learner outcomes in accordance with the Higher Education Standards (Learner Person, Co-Creator and Active (Global Citizen).
Quality Standards Description
Instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study must produce graduates who occupy 3 learners outcomes of higher education standards, 1) learner person t 2) co-creator and 3) active citizen.
Curriculum performance can reflect the quality of the graduates considering from the satisfaction of graduates users with regard to learner outcomes.
Assessment Criteria
The average assessment score of graduates (full score of 5)
Formula for Calculation
Score = Sum of Graduate Assessment Scores
Total Number of Graduates Assessed
Notes:
1) Number of graduates evaluated by graduate users must not be less than 20% of the total number of graduates.
2) Satisfaction evaluation of Self-employed graduates will not be considered.
3) In case of international programs, the 20% will be considered from the total number of Thai students in that program.
4) In case of improved curriculum that still has no graduates, the results of the previous performance will be used.
5) Number of learner outcomes used in the assessment are as specified in Higher Education Standards.
2.1.3 English language and 21st Century working skills competency.
Quality Standards Description
The instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study must produce graduates to have the ability to work in the 21st century, which covers the ability in 2 areas, namely the ability to use English And working skills in the 21st century or apply advanced knowledge to get empirical results in graduate study level.
Curriculum performance can reflect the quality of the graduates considering from the satisfaction of graduates users with regard to their skills in job performance suitable for the 21st century skills.
Assessment Criteria
The average assessment score of graduates (full score of 5)
Formula for Calculation
Score = Sum of Graduate Assessment Scores
Total Number of Graduates Assessed
Notes:
1) Number of graduates evaluated by graduate users must not be less than 20% of the total number of graduates.
2) Satisfaction evaluation of Self-employed graduates will not be considered.
3) In case of international programs, the 20% will be considered from the total number of Thai students in that program.
4) In case of improved curriculum that still has no graduates, the results of the previous performance will be used.
5) Issues in job performance suitable for the 21st century skills used in the assessment are as specified by institution.
Operational Result
2.1.1 Aspect of Learning Outcomes in accordance with the Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education.
The faculty has surveyed scholars’ quality in accordance with the National Higher Education Qualification criteria framework from employers that have been rendered the service. Graduate Diploma in Teaching Profession Program has surveyed graduates of Academic Year 2021. Employers have feedback on 37 out of 49 graduates with an average evaluation of 4.71 out of 5 marks which is higher than the last year (4.69). Employers were highly satisfied with the teaching performance of their teachers. Students were able to apply what they have learned from all the Graduate Diploma courses.
=83.33% of the graduate users responded to the feedback survey
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 2.1.1 | 4.71 |
2.1.2 3 Aspects of learner outcomes in accordance with the Higher Education Standards (Learner Person, Co-Creator and Active (Global Citizen).
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
Level |
Evidence |
|
6. Person Learner |
4.40 |
High |
Summary Report of Employers’ Feedback Survey |
|
7. Co-Creator |
4.44 |
High |
|
|
8. Active (Global) Citizen |
4.47 |
High |
|
|
Total |
4.44 |
High |
………Calculation…….
Score = Sum of Graduate Assessment Scores/Total Number of Graduates Assessed
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 2.1.2 | 4.44 |
2.1.3 English language and 21st Century working skills competency.
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
Level |
Evidence |
|
1. English Language Communication Skills |
4.84 |
Highest |
Summary Report of Employers’ Feedback Survey |
|
21st Century Skills Competencies |
|||
|
2. Learning and Innovation |
4.77 |
High |
|
|
3. Information, Media, and Technology Skills |
4.18 |
High |
|
|
4. Life and Career Skills |
4.67 |
High |
|
|
5. Utilization of Knowledge and Dissemination to Public |
4.37 |
High |
|
|
Total |
4.57 |
High |
|
………Calculation…….
Score = Sum of Graduate Assessment Scores/Total Number of Graduates Assessed
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 2.1.3 | 4.57 |
Evidence
| 2.1.1.1 | Graduates’ Employers Survey |
| 2.1.2.1 | Graduates’ Employers Survey |
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 2.1.1 | 4.71 |
| 2.1.2 | 4.44 |
| 2.1.3 | 4.57 |
| Overall Average Score 2.1 | 4.57 |