Quality Standards 4.2 Quality of Instructors
Quality Standards 4.2 Quality of Instructors
Quality Standards Type Outcome
Quality Standards Description:
Instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study must manage the curriculum according to the system and mechanism for management and instructor improvement and development to produce empirical results that can be seen from qualified and quality instructors that are suitable for the curriculum/program and quality academic outputs.
Quality of instructors responsible for the curriculum/program of study result from well defined recruitment and appointment system, and instructor management and improvement and development system. Therefore directed degree qualification instructors, holding doctoral degree instructors, holding academic ranks instructors, and instructors with good quality academic outputs are in the curriculum/program appropriately.
Assessment criteria
Curriculum management performance that showed the quality of instructors will be based on:
Indicator 4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications which are classified into 3 sub-indicators:
4.2.1-1 Directed degree qualification instructors,
4.2.1-2 Holding doctoral degree instructors, and
4.2.1-3 Holding academic ranks instructors.
Indicator 4.2.2 Instructors Academic Outputs.
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct/Related Degree Qualification
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (X / 5)*100 = Y
2) Received score = (Y / 100)*5
– 100% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = 5 mark
4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degree
Assessment Criteria
Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees into a score of between 0 – 5.
– Bachelors Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 20% or higher.
– Masters Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with Doctoral Degrees is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (X / 5)*100 = Y
2) Received score = (Y / 60)*5
– 60% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = 5 mark
Remark:
Doctoral Degree qualifications are defined as Level of qualifications awarded to a PhD Or qualifications equivalent to a doctorate degree according to the criteria for considering qualifications, the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. In the event that the educational background is adjusted, the educational background adjustment shall be counted within the academic year being assessed.
4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks
Assessment Criteria
Convert the percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with academic rank into a score of between 0 – 5.
– Bachelors Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 60% or higher.
– Masters Degree Program
The percentage of Instructors Responsible for a Program of Study with rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor combined is defined as 5 = 80% or higher.
Calculation Formula
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = (X / 5)*100 = Y
2) Received score = (Y / 80)*5
– 80% of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = 5 mark
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
Assessment criteria
Convert percentage of academic outputs of the instructor responsible for the curriculum to a score between 0-5, with 20 percent or more of academic outputs equal score 5 (Bachelor Degree Level) and 40 percent or more of academic outputs equal score 5 (Master Degree Level and Graduate Diploma Level) .
Calculation Formula
– Bachelor degree level (20% of academic outputs = 5 marks)
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y
2.Received score = (Y / 20)*5
– Master degree and Graduate Diploma level (40% of academic outputs = 5 marks)
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (X/5)*100 = Y
2.Received score = (Y / 40)*5 = 5
Notes
1.Publications and works of instructors will be counted from the date of publication in national or international journals. Not counting from the date of acceptance.
2.Published articles must be in document or electronics full paper format.
3.Research outputs of instructors published in the assessment year are all counted.
4.Published articles can be weighted according to the quality of academic works as indicated in the table below.
Quality Levels of Academic Outputs
| Weight | Quality Level |
| 0.20 | – A full research/academic article published in proceedings of a national conference |
| 0.40 |
–
A full research/academic article published in the proceedings of an
international conference. – Output that was registered as a petty patent |
| 0.60 | – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 2 of the TCI database |
| 0.80 | – A research/academic article that is published in an academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database. |
| 1.00 |
–
A research/academic article published in an international academic journal
that is listed in an international database in the Civil Service Commission
on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement, or the OHEC Regulations
Regarding Criteria to Appraise Journals that Disseminate Academic Output of
2013. – Output that was registered as a patent – Academic service to society that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank – Research granted by a national department/organization – Discovery of new plant/animal species that has been registered – Textbook/books or translated books that has passed assessment for requesting academic rank – Textbook/book translated books that has passed assessment criteria for requesting academic rank, but has not been used in an academic rank request – A research/academic article that is citeded in a national academic journal listed in Group 1 of the TCI database or in an international journal listed in international database according to the Civil Service Commission on Institutions of Higher Education Announcement. |
Operational Result
4.2.1 Instructor Qualifications
4.2.1-1 Curricular/Program of Studies Direct Degree Qualification
No. 1 รศ. ดร. อำพน ธรรมเจริญ (Assoc.Prof.Dr. Ampon Dhamachareon)
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | คณิตศาสตร์ | วิทยาลัยวิชาการศึกษาประสานมิตรม ประเทศไทย | 2514 |
| Master | คณิตศาสตร์ | วิทยาลัยวิชาการศึกษาประสานมิตรม ประเทศไทย | 2516 |
| Master | Applied Mathematics | North Carolina State University, U.S.A. | 2526 |
| Doctor | Applied Mathematics | North Carolina State University, U.S.A. | 2529 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Efficient Numerical Methods for Solving Differential Algebraic | Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physic Vol. 04 No. 01 2016 pp 39-47 | SCOPUS | 2559 |
| The Cause Source and Preventive Ways of PM2.5 Dust in Bangkok, Thailand | Transport, Energy & Environment eJournal Vol 1, Issue 9, February 25, 2019 pp 1-5 | SSRN | 2561 |
| Factors Affecting Intention to Buy and Evaluation of Perceived Risks of E-Commerce Products | eBusiness and eCommerce eJournal vol. 11 No. 35 05 jun 2019 | SSRN | 2562 |
| Factors Analysis For The Values In The Teaching Profession Of Thailand | Solid State Technology Vol. 64 No. 1 (2021) pp 1862 – 1866 | SCOPUS | 2563 |
No. 2 ผศ. ดร. สมเจตน์ ไวยาการณ์ (Asst.Prof.Dr. Somjate Waiyakarn)
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | คณิตศาสตร์ | จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย ประเทศไทย | 2510 |
| Master | สถิติประยุกต์ | สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์ ประเทศไทย | 2516 |
| Doctor | การวิจัยและพัฒนาหลักสูตร | มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒประสานมิตร ประเทศไทย | 2530 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Linking Work Integrated Learning and Competency of Graduates pursuing Graduate Diploma in Teaching Profession. | Journal of Education and Practice Vol7, No 10 2016 pp 121-12 | ERIC | 2558 |
| The Cause Source and Preventive Ways of PM2.5 Dust in Bangkok, Thailand | Transport, Energy & Environment eJournal Vol 1, Issue 9, February 25, 2019 pp 1-5 | SSRN | 2561 |
| Factors Affecting Intention to Buy and Evaluation of Perceived Risks of E-Commerce Products | eBusiness and eCommerce eJournal vol. 11 No. 35 05 jun 2019 | SSRN | 2562 |
| Factors Analysis For The Values In The Teaching Profession Of Thailand | Solid State Technology Vol. 64 No. 1 (2021) pp 1862 – 1866 | SCOPUS | 2563 |
No. 3 ผศ. ดร. ศรัณย์ ว่องไว (Asst.Prof.Dr.Sarun Wongwai)
- Educational backgrounds
| Degree | Major | Institution | Year |
| Bachelor | คณิตศาสตร์ | วิทยาลัยครูสกลนคร ประเทศไทย | 2525 |
| Master | การสอนคณิตศาสตร์ | มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่ ประเทศไทย | 2534 |
| Doctor | คณิตศาสตร์ | มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่ ประเทศไทย | 2543 |
- Academic Works
| Title | Name of Journal | Index | Year |
| Competency to Develop an Instructional Model Which Emphasizes the Abilities in Solving the Problems of the Teachers in the Scholarship Project of the Promotion of Science and Mathematics Talented Teachers (PSMT) | Anthropology of Education eJournal Vol 2, Issue 62, May 10, 2017 pp 1-5 | SSRN | 2559 |
| Modeling and Mapping Personal Learning Environment of Thai International Higher Education Students | Asian Journal of Education and Training Vol 4 No 1 2018 pp 35-40 | SCOPUS | 2560 |
| The Stem Education Management and the Learning in the 21st Century of Secondary School Students in Thailand | Change Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal Vol 9, Issue 7, March 13, 2018 pp 1-3 | SSRN | 2560 |
| The Trends of Aviation Business in the NewNormal Condition of Thailand | Solid State Technology Volume: 63 Issue: 6 Publication Year: 2020 pp 16737-16747 | SCOPUS | 2563 |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who has direct degree qualification = (3 / 3)*100 = 100
2) Received score = (100/ 100)*5 = 5
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-1 | 5 |
4.2.1-2 Holding Doctoral Degrees
| No. | Name of the Lecturer | Degree |
| 1 | รศ. ดร. อำพน ธรรมเจริญ (Assoc.Prof.Dr. Ampon Dhamachareon) | Doctoral |
| 2 | ผศ. ดร. สมเจตน์ ไวยาการณ์ (Asst.Prof.Dr. Somjate Waiyakarn) | Doctoral |
| 3 | ผศ. ดร. ศรัณย์ ว่องไว (Asst.Prof.Dr.Sarun Wongwai) | Doctoral |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold doctoral degrees = (3 / 3)*100 = 100
2) Received score = (100 / 60)*5 = 5
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-2 | 5 |
4.2.1-3 Holding Academic Ranks
| No. | Name of the Lecturer | Academic Ranks |
| 1 | รศ. ดร. อำพน ธรรมเจริญ (Assoc.Prof.Dr. Ampon Dhamachareon) | Associate Professor |
| 2 | ผศ. ดร. สมเจตน์ ไวยาการณ์ (Asst.Prof.Dr. Somjate Waiyakarn) | Assistant Professor |
| 3 | ผศ. ดร. ศรัณย์ ว่องไว (Asst.Prof.Dr.Sarun Wongwai) | Assistant Professor |
………..Calculation………..
1) Percentage of instructors responsible curriculum/program of study who hold academic ranks = (3/ 3)*100 = 100
2) Received score = (100 / 80)*5 =8
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-3 | 5 |
Evidence
| 4.2.1.1 | Assoc.Prof.Dr. Ampon Dhamachareon |
| 4.2.1.2 | Asst.Prof.Dr. Somjate Waiyakarn |
| 4.2.1.3 | Asst.Prof.Dr.Sarun Wongwai |
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1-1 | 5 |
| 4.2.1-2 | 5 |
| 4.2.1-3 | 5 |
| Overall Average Score 4.2.1 | 5 |
4.2.2 Faculty Members Academic Productivity (Weighted Sum of Academic Productivity)
- Instructor Academic Outputs in 2021 Academic Year
| No. | Title | Author | Journal | Indexed |
| 1 | The Success in the Quality Culture Development of Thai Higher Education Institutions | – Vichian Puncreobutr – Sarun Wongwai – Wilailak Tangcharaen – Piyada Wattanasan | Psychology and Education, 58(7), 6854- 6864 (Jul. 2021) | SCOPUS |
| 2 | Factors Influencing The Development Of Digital Literacy Skills In Thailand According To The Thailand 4.0 Policy | – Vichian Puncreobutr – Somjate Waiyakarn – Wannee Tapaneeyakorn – Apichaya Chuepan | Webology, 19(2), 9273- 9284. (Feb. 2022) | SCOPUS |
| 3 | Factors Affecting The Readiness Of Thai Universities To Organize Learning Activities In The Metaverse Era | – Vichian Puncreobutr – Ampon Dhamacharoen – Wannee Tapaneeyakorn | Webology, 19(2), 9285- 9296. (Feb. 2022) | SCOPUS |
| 4 | Rehabilitation for Depression Among High School Students Using Group Activity Program in Schools in Bangkok, Thailand | – Vichian Puncreobutr – Kanchana Koowatthanasiri – Sarun Wongwai – Sirikorn Suthawatnatcha | Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 9796 (May. 2022) | SCOPUS |
………..Calculation………..
1.Percentage of weighted sum of academic outputs = (4/3)*100 = 133.33
2.Received score = 133.33/ 40)*5 = 5
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.2 | 5 |
Evidence
| Self-Assessment | Score |
| 4.2.1 | 5 |
| 4.2.2 | 5 |
| Overall Average Score 4.2 | 5 |