{"id":10358,"date":"2023-01-04T04:21:31","date_gmt":"2023-01-04T04:21:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/education\/?post_type=ede_report&p=10358"},"modified":"2024-06-27T05:04:49","modified_gmt":"2024-06-27T05:04:49","slug":"component-2-learning-outcomes","status":"publish","type":"ede_report","link":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/education\/?ede_report=component-2-learning-outcomes","title":{"rendered":"-Component 2: Learning Outcomes"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Indicator 2.1. Expected Learning Outcomes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

For criteria 6 and 7, it is assessed using the Office of Permanent Secretary of Higher Education, Science, Research, and Innovations standards.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Score 1<\/strong><\/td>Score 2<\/strong><\/td>Score 3<\/strong><\/td> Score 4<\/strong> <\/td> Score 5<\/strong> <\/td><\/tr>
Has action 1 item<\/td> Has action 2 item <\/td>Has action 3-4 item <\/td>Has action 5-6 item <\/td>Has action 7 item <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

AUN-QA based criteria<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
AUN-QA Criterion 1 \u2013 Expected Learning Outcomes<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

For AUN-QA, criteria 1 to 5 are assessed at 7 levels.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Operational Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. Expected learning outcomes are formulated and communicated <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

The\u00a0 Program\u00a0 Expected Learning Outcomes ( PLOs) are\u00a0 \u00a0carefully designed based on Educational taxonomy and are aligned to the Faculty and\u00a0 \u00a0University’s\u00a0 vision and mission ;\u00a0 communicated to all lecturers and students. There are\u00a0 (5) five\u00a0 Program Learning Outcome for general Education namely:<\/p>\n

1.1\u00a0 General Education<\/strong><\/p>\n

1.1.1\u00a0 Moral & Ethics<\/p>\n

1.1.2 Knowledge\u00a0<\/p>\n

1.1.3 Cognitive<\/p>\n

1.1.4 Interpersonal and Responsibility<\/p>\n

1.1. 5 <\/strong>Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology<\/p>\n

There are total of\u00a0 (6) six Program Learning Outcomes for the\u00a0 specialised courses, namely:\u00a0<\/p>\n

1.2 S<\/span><\/strong>pecialised Courses<\/span><\/p>\n

1.2.1\u00a0 Moral & Ethics\u00a0<\/p>\n

1.2.2 Knowledge<\/p>\n

1.2.3 Cognitive Skills\u00a0<\/p>\n

1.2.4 Interpersonal and Responsibility<\/p>\n

1.2.5 Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology<\/p>\n

1.2.6Learning Management Methodology<\/p>\n

The above-mentioned Program Learning Outcomes are aligned with the University’s Vision\u00a0 & Mission below.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Mission :<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong>1) To produce graduates with high performance in academic, professional and English language.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2) Develop research and academic works to be recognized at the national and international level<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3) Develop a Center of Excellence in Academic, Professional and English Language<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4) Preserve Thai and international arts and cultures to become a multicultural society.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5) Manage the organization towards excellence.<\/span><\/p>\n

Vision <\/strong>:
<\/strong> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 To be a\u00a0 leading\u00a0 university\u00a0 nationally and internationally recognized.<\/span><\/p>\n

At the beginning of each semester, the\u00a0 head of the program conducts meeting\u00a0 with all lecturers to communicate the following:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Vision, Mission and Philosophy of the Faculty<\/li>\n
  • Program Learning Outcomes<\/li>\n
  • Year- Level\u00a0 learning Outcomes\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 In the meeting, formulation of\u00a0 specific learning\u00a0 outcomes for each course is being discussed. The faculty of has been doing this for years and it has been observed , based on the instructors tqf3, the the instructors have\u00a0 a good understanding\u00a0 of the\u00a0 Program Learning Outcomes.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n

    2. Designed expected learning outcomes are appropriate with the learning management<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Each course has designated learning outcomes which are aligned with established program learning outcomes. The academic staff , then, carefully design teaching-learning activities to achieve the course learning outcomes ( CLOs) of the course. The Course Learning Outcomes are communicated through our TQF 3 and TQF 4. The lectures them formulate specific classroom learning outcomes to achieve the required learning outcomes for each course. Year Learning Outcomes ( YLOs )  and are aligned with Generic Learning Outcomes and the learning Management. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Evaluation and Improvement Plan<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Each lecturer has to evaluate and report whether each established course learning outcomes is achieved or not at the end of the semester through TQF 5 and TQF 6. The lecturer discusses the problems encountered and suggest plan to further improve the program. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    3. Generic learning outcomes and specific learning outcomes are formulated.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

    The program has formulated\u00a0 both the General\u00a0 and specific learning outcomes for the program and the courses as seen in the curriculum Mapping. These\u00a0 general and specific learning outcomes\u00a0 \u00a0regularly evaluated and improved based on the feedback of students, instructors and stakeholders.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n

    Evaluation and Improvement Plan<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Program Generic Learning Outcomes are continuously improve to meet the demand of stakeholders. The Program determines the achievement of our Program learning Outcome (PLOs ) and Course Learning Outcomes ( CLOs) through our TQF 5 and TQF 4 submitted by the teacher at the end of the semester.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n

    4. Expected learning outcomes meet the requirement of external stakeholders<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

    All Learning outcomes are formulated\u00a0 based on the suggestions of different stakeholders, including external stakeholders.\u00a0 The table below shows the\u00a0 summary of the\u00a0 evaluation results of our graduates :\u00a0<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. The table below shows the graduates quality assessment:\n
        \n
      1. Six (6 ) Aspects of Learning Outcomes<\/u><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        \n

        Learning Outcomes<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Mean<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Level<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Evidence<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        1. Ethical & Moral Devt.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        4.21<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		Very High<\/td>\n\n

        Employers Satisfaction Survey Form<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        2.Knowledge Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        4.24<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        3. Cognitive Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        4.12<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0High<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        4. Interpersonal Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		3.89<\/td>\nVery High<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        \n

        5. Analytical and\u00a0 Use of IT Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        4.22<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0Very High<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        6. Professional\u00a0 Skills ( Teaching Skills)\u00a0<\/p>\n

        Total:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        4.23<\/p>\n

        4.15\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High<\/strong><\/p>\n

        High<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

        Based on the employer\u2019s evaluation, our alumni got a weighted mean of 4.15\u00a0 or high satisfaction on the six\u00a0 (6) aspects of learning outcomes.<\/p>\n

        Legend:\u00a0<\/p>\n

        4.21-5.00- Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n

        3.41-4.20- High Satisfaction<\/p>\n

        2.61-3.40-Moderate Satisfaction<\/p>\n

        1.81-2.60- Low Satisfaction<\/p>\n

        1.00-1.80- Very Low Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        From the above result of the evaluation of our stakeholders, we can conclude that our Program Learning Outcomes meet the requirements of our stakeholders.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n

        5. The expected learning outcomes are achieved by the students by the time they graduate<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

        The expected learning outcomes are achieved by the students before they graduate as indicated in the result of\u00a0 school mentors\u00a0 and college’s supervisor of our graduating students.\u00a0<\/p>\n

        School Mentor\u2019s and College\u2019s Supervisor Evaluation Summary \u00a0of our Senior Students<\/strong><\/p>\n

        Table 1: Summary of \u00a0School Mentor\u2019s Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        \n

        Learning Outcomes<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        1. Moral & Ethics<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.81<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        2. Knowledge<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.93<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        3. Cognitive Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.67<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.74<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        5. \u00a0Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.56<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        6. Learning Management Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.89<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        Overall Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.76<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0\u00a0High Satisfaction<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        \n

        Learning Outcomes<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        1. Moral & Ethics<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.59<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        2. Knowledge<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.57<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        3. Cognitive Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.63<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.91<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        5. \u00a0Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.75<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        6. Learning Management Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.81<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        Overall Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.71<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u00a0\u00a0High Satisfaction<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

        Table 2: Summary of \u00a0College\u2019s Supervisor \u00a0Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes <\/em><\/p>\n

        The (2) two tables above show the result of our partner schools, where are our senior students\u00a0 conduct their internship,\u00a0 and our internship supervisor\u00a0 evaluation our\u00a0 senior students performance. From the above results of evaluation, we can conclude that our\u00a0 \u00a0our expected learning outcomes are achieved by our students\u00a0 by the time they graduate.<\/p>\n\n\n

        6. The assessment result of students\u2019 learning outcomes in 4 aspects: knowledge, skills, morals and ethics, and personal characteristics from each level have to be higher than 3.51   <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

        As show in the date below, the assessment results of students learning outcomes in all aspects is higher than 3.51<\/p>\n

        Mentor\u2019s and College\u2019s Supervisor Evaluation Summary  of our Senior Students<\/strong><\/p>\n

        Table 1: Summary of  School Mentor\u2019s Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes <\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        \n

        Learning Outcomes<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        1. Moral & Ethics<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.81<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        2. Knowledge<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.93<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        3. Cognitive Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.67<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.74<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        5.  Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.56<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        6. Learning Management Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.89<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        Overall Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.76<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

          High Satisfaction<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        \n

        Learning Outcomes<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        1. Moral & Ethics<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.59<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        2. Knowledge<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.57<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        3. Cognitive Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.63<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.91<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        5.  Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.75<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        6. Learning Management Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.81<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        Overall Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.71<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

          High Satisfaction<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

        Table 2: Summary of  College\u2019s Supervisor  Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes <\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n

        7. The average of the assessment result of all 4 aspects of students\u2019 learning outcomes has to be higher than 3.51<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<\/p>\n

        As the data indicated,  the average of the assessment results of all aspect of Student’s Learning Outcomes is higher than 3.51 . <\/p>\n

        School Mentor\u2019s and College\u2019s Supervisor Evaluation Summary  of our Senior Students<\/strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n

        Table 1: Summary of  School Mentor\u2019s Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes <\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        \n

        Learning Outcomes<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        1. Moral & Ethics<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.81<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        2. Knowledge<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.93<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        3. Cognitive Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.67<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.74<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        5.  Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.56<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        6. Learning Management Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.89<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Very High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        Overall Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.76<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

          High Satisfaction<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        \n

        Learning Outcomes<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        1. Moral & Ethics<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.59<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        2. Knowledge<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.57<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        3. Cognitive Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.63<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.91<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        5.  Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.75<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        6. Learning Management Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.81<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

         High Satisfaction<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        Overall Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        3.71<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

          High Satisfaction<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

        Table 2: Summary of  College\u2019s Supervisor  Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes <\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n

        Self-Assessment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        \n

        \u0e40\u0e1b\u0e49\u0e32\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e32\u0e22<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e14\u0e33\u0e40\u0e19\u0e34\u0e19\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23(KPI\u0e40\u0e0a\u0e34\u0e07\u0e04\u0e38\u0e13\u0e20\u0e32\u0e1e\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e23\u0e30\u0e1a\u0e38\u0e02\u0e49\u0e2d)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        \u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e21\u0e34\u0e19\u0e15\u0e19\u0e40\u0e2d\u0e07<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        ….5\u0e02\u0e49\u0e2d….<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        IQA(1-7)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        1-7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        7 items<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

        \n

        AUN-QA(1-5)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		\n

        1(4), 2(4), 3(4)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        		5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

        Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Evidence No.<\/strong><\/td>List of evidences<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
        2.1.1.1<\/td>Program Learning Outcomes ( TQF2) , Curriculum Map,
        College’s Vision and Mission<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
        2.1.1.2<\/td> Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) TQF 3\/TQF 4 and TQF 5 \/TQF 6<\/a>
        Year Learning Outcomes ( YLOs) <\/a>
        <\/td><\/tr>
        2.1.1.3<\/td>General and Specific LOs Curriculum Mappin<\/a>g
        Year Learning Outcomes (YLOs)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
        2.1.1.4<\/td>Stakeholder Evaluation <\/a><\/td><\/tr>
        2.1.1.5<\/td>Seniors Students Evaluation<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
        2.1.1.6<\/td>School Mentor’s & College Supervisor Evaluation Summary . Each level of the learning outcome is higher than 3.51<\/a> <\/td><\/tr>
        2.1.1.7<\/td>Assessment of All aspect is higher than 3.51<\/a> <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

        Self-Assessment<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Self-Assessment<\/strong> <\/td>IQA<\/strong><\/td>AUN-QA<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
        Indicator 2.1<\/td>5<\/td>5<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"menu_order":7,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/education\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/ede_report\/10358"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/education\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/ede_report"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/education\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/ede_report"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/education\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/education\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}