{"id":3843,"date":"2022-12-26T07:57:03","date_gmt":"2022-12-26T07:57:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/humanities-social-sciences\/?page_id=3843"},"modified":"2023-07-17T04:17:08","modified_gmt":"2023-07-17T04:17:08","slug":"component-7-indicator-7-1-student-results-student-learning-customer-focused-service-results-process-results","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/humanities-social-sciences\/?page_id=3843","title":{"rendered":"Component 7: Indicator 7.1 Student Results (Student Learning, Customer-Focused Service Results, Process Results)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Component 7 Results<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Indicator 7.1 Student Results (Student Learning, Customer-Focused Service Results, Process Results)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

MHESI IQA (Items 1-6) assessment is indicated in the table below<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
1 mark<\/strong><\/td>2 marks<\/strong><\/td>3<\/strong> marks<\/strong> <\/td>4<\/strong> marks<\/strong> <\/td>5<\/strong> marks<\/strong> <\/td><\/tr>
1 item<\/td>2 items<\/td>3 items <\/td>4-5 items <\/td>6 items <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

According to EdPEx standard, the total score to assess items 1-4 is 120 marks<\/span>, the factors used to evaluate the process are LeTCI.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Performance<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. Student learning and Customer-Focused Service results<\/strong>. What are the results of student learning, and student and another customer service?<\/p>\n\n\n

The student learning outcomes <\/strong>and customer-focused service results <\/strong>are obtained from the achievements of the strategic objectives stated in Section 2.1.6. The results are displayed in the tables below.<\/p>\n

Learning Outcomes (Students\u2019 Self-Evaluation)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Outcomes<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2020<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2021<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Knowledge<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.66<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.95<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.92<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Skills<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.54<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.95<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.91<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Moral and ethics<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.65<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.48<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.05<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Personal characteristics<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.66<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.35<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.05<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

English Proficiency (fourth-year students\u2019 TOEIC score average)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

CA = Ave. 277.86<\/p>\n

(highest 380)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

CA = Ave. 353.13<\/p>\n

(highest 645)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

CA =337 (highest 625)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

BE = Ave. 497.86<\/p>\n

(highest 870)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

BE = Ave. 461.04<\/p>\n

(highest 835)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

BE = 517 (highest 740)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Customer-focused service results<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Education management<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2020<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2021<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Total number of new students<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

49<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

26<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

93<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Total number of students doing Internship<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

31<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

41<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

48<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Number of students employed<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12 from 17<\/p>\n

70.59%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20 from 29<\/p>\n

68.97%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

37 from 43<\/p>\n

86.05%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Number of fourth-year students\u2019 thesis<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Graduate users\u2019 satisfaction<\/p>\n

–          Knowledge<\/p>\n

–          Skills<\/p>\n

–          Moral and Ethics<\/p>\n

–          Personal characteristics<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.40<\/p>\n

4.06<\/p>\n

5.00<\/p>\n

4.47<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.27<\/p>\n

4.37<\/p>\n

4.30<\/p>\n

4.30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.49<\/p>\n

4.60<\/p>\n

4.94<\/p>\n

4.80<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Research<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

19<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Academic and community service<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Learning Outcomes meets other customer groups\u2019 need<\/strong><\/p>\n

The results of this issue are from academic and community services. The Faculty evaluates the satisfaction of all parties participating in the services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Service<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Satisfaction Level<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Recipients (students)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

School teachers<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

BE\/CA students<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

English academic camp<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.44<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.63<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Multimedia camp<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.46<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.39<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

English camp (reading skill development)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.50<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Strong and sustainable community<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.86<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

2. Work Process effectiveness results (Process Effectiveness and Efficiency). <\/strong>What are process effectiveness and efficiency results?<\/p>\n\n\n

The Process of Efficiency and Effectiveness <\/strong>(Section 6.2.1) of the 4 main strategic missions yield the results shown in the table below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Strategic mission<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Results<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Administration and Management<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The allocated budget is used efficiently as stated in projects and activities.<\/p>\n

Allocated budget for 2022: 579,675 <\/strong><\/p>\n

Budget spent: 410, 249.32<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Research<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

– Five research studies were conducted and published in prestigious journals.<\/p>\n

– Research fund: internal: 28,000 \/ external: 250,000<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Education Management <\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

– Students\u2019 high satisfaction levels from self-evaluation; Knowledge (3.922), Skills (3.91), Morality (4.05), Personal Characteristics (4.05)<\/p>\n

– Both curricula are accredited.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Academic\/community service<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

– 5 research studies were conducted and published in accredited journals.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

3. Work Process effectiveness results (Safety and Emergency Preparedness).<\/strong>  What are safety and emergency preparedness results?<\/p>\n\n\n

Following the safety and emergency preparedness mentioned in Sections 6.2.3 and 6.2.4, after a freshman died in a motorcycle accident, emergencies such as motorcycle or car accidents or sports accidents have zero occurrence among the Faculty\u2019s students. For lecturers, the Faculty has found that by following all precaution guidelines, no lecturers have had accidents, or gotten sick from illness. The evidence to prove the effectiveness of the safety guidelines is the record of the faculty members\u2019 annual leave displaying that most of the faculty members have not asked for sick leave.<\/p>\n

\u0e2b\u0e25\u0e31\u0e01\u0e10\u0e32\u0e19<\/p>\n

7.1.3.2 \u0e2a\u0e23\u0e38\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e32\u0e22\u0e07\u0e32\u0e19\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e25\u0e32<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

4. Supply-Network Management results. <\/strong>What are your supply-network management results?<\/p>\n\n\n

In Section 6.1.7, the Faculty manages supply-network management for three missions: education management (curricula), research, and academic service. The results of the management are as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Mission<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Results<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

2020<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2021<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Education management Number of student<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

49<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

26<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

93<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Research: Number of published research articles<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

19<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Academic and community service: Number of the service<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

5. Assessment of students\u2019 learning outcomes of the final year students is in accordance with the goals.<\/p>\n\n\n

…..<\/p>\n

At the end of the academic year, the Faculty has students in all year perform different evaluations one of which is for the fourth-year students to evaluate themselves in 4 learning outcomes. Also, these students are required to take an official TOEIC test from which the score is served as one of the criteria for graduation.<\/p>\n

Fourth-year students\u2019 TOEIC score<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Program<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2020<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2021<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Average score<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Over 600<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Highest<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Average score<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Over 600<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Highest<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Average score<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Over 600<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Highest<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

BE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

497.77<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

870<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

461.04<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

835<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

517.08<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

740<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

277.26<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

380<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

353.13<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

645<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

337.08<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

625<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Percentage of students obtaining the scores over 600 (the College\u2019s benchmark) in 2022 is 18.82.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Learning outcomes set by Standard Criteria for Higher Education <\/strong>2022<\/strong><\/p>\n

Fourth-year students\u2019 learning outcomes<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Learning outcomes<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

BE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

CA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Knowledge<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.94<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Skill<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.94<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Morality<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.03<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.00<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Personal characteristics<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.15<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

6. Assessment of students\u2019 English proficiency of the final year students is in accordance with the goals.<\/p>\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n

With the identity of an \u2018international\u2019 educational institution, the College has emphasized the development of students\u2019 English proficiency and adopted the TOEIC score as a benchmark for all-year students. The benchmark score determined for fourth-year students is at least 600; thus, these students are required to take an official TOEIC test as one of the requirements for graduation.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Fourth-year students\u2019 TOEIC score<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Program<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2020<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2021<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Average score<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Over 600<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Highest<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Average score<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Over 600<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Highest<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Average score<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Over 600<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Highest<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

BE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

497.77<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

870<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

461.04<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

835<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

517.08<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

740<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

277.26<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

380<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

353.13<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

645<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

337.08<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

625<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

Self-Assessment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Goal<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Performance <\/strong>Qualitative indicators (indicated items)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Self assessment<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

5 items\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

IQA (1-6)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,2,3,4,5,6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6 items<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5 marks<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

EdPEx (1-4)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,2,3,4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Percentage 10<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12 marks<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Evidence No.<\/strong><\/td>List of evidences<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
7.1.1<\/td>–<\/td><\/tr>
7.1.2<\/td>–<\/td><\/tr>
7.1.3<\/td> 7.1.3.2 \u0e2a\u0e23\u0e38\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e32\u0e22\u0e07\u0e32\u0e19\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e25\u0e32<\/a> <\/td><\/tr>
7.1.4<\/td>–<\/td><\/tr>
7.1.5<\/td>–<\/td><\/tr>
7.1.6<\/td>–<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Component 7 Results Indicator 7.1 Student Results (Student Learning, Customer-Focused Service Results, Process Results) MHESI IQA (Items 1-6) assessment is indicated in the table below 1 mark 2 marks 3 marks 4 marks 5 marks 1 item 2 items 3 items 4-5 items 6 items According to EdPEx standard, the total score to assess items […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":44,"menu_order":7,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/humanities-social-sciences\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3843"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/humanities-social-sciences\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/humanities-social-sciences\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/humanities-social-sciences\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/humanities-social-sciences\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3843"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/humanities-social-sciences\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3843\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4677,"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/humanities-social-sciences\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3843\/revisions\/4677"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/humanities-social-sciences\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/44"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2223\/humanities-social-sciences\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}