Criterion 8 – Output and Outcomes

Criterion 8 – Output and Outcomes

Requirements for AUNQA Criterion 8
8.1 Pass and dropout rates

The pass rate, dropout rate, and average time to graduate are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

Diagnostic questions
  • Does the programme have an efficient system to monitor the pass rates and dropout rates of students?
  • What does the programme think of the pass rates? If not satisfactory, what measures are taken to improve the pass rates?
  • What is the dropout rate? Are there explanations for the dropout rate?
  • Does the department know where the dropout students go to?
  • What does the department think of the average time to graduate?
  • What measures have been taken to promote graduation and to shorten the average time to graduate?
  • What effects do these measures have?
8.2 Employability

Employability as well as self-employment, entrepreneurship, and advancement to further studies, are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

Diagnostic questions
  • What percentage of graduates find a job within six months of graduation over the past five years? What percentage of graduates found a job within one year of graduation?
  • What percentage of graduates are still unemployed one year after graduation?
  • Do the graduates get jobs easily? What are the career prospects of the graduates over the last five years?
8.3 Research and creative work

Research and creative work output and activities carried out by the academic staff and students, are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

Diagnostic questions
  • What types of research activities are carried out by the students? Are these activities aligned to the expected learning outcomes and the vision and mission of the university and faculty?
  • What types of research activities are carried out by academic staff? Are these activities aligned to the vision and mission of the university and faculty?
  • What is the level of research grants and how is it utilised?
  • What is the number of research papers published? Are the research papers published in national, regional, and/or international journals?
8.4 Outcomes achievement

Data are provided to show directly the achievement of the programme outcomes, which are established and monitored.

Diagnostic questions
  • Is the quality of the graduates satisfactory?
  • Do the achieved standards match the expected standards?
8.5 Stakeholders’ satisfaction

Satisfaction level of the various stakeholders are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

Diagnostic questions
  • What mechanisms are available for staff to express their satisfaction or dissatisfaction about the programme, resources, facilities, processes, policies, etc?
  • What indicators are used to measure and monitor the satisfaction level of staff?
  • What initiatives are carried out to raise the satisfaction level of staff? Are they effective?
  • Does the department know what students think about the courses, programme, teaching, examinations, etc?
  • How does the department cope with the feedback and complaints from students?
  • What is the opinion and feedback of the graduates about the competencies that they have acquired?
  • How is feedback from the alumni used to improve the programme?
  • Are employers satisfied with the quality of the graduates?
  • Are there any specific complaints about the graduates
  • Are specific strengths of the graduates appreciated by the employers?
Scoring for TRSU QA
TRSU QA score12345
Items showing
QA practice
1 item2 items3 items4 items5 items
AUNQA scoring rubrics

A seven-point rating scale used for AUNQA assessment is described below.

1. Absolutely inadequate

The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is not implemented
There are no plans, documents, evidences or results available. 
Immediate improvement must be made.

2. Inadequate and improvement is necessary

The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is still at its planning stage or is inadequate where improvement is necessary. 
There is little document or evidence available. 
Performance of the QA practice shows little or poor results.

3. Inadequate but minor improvement will make it adequate

The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is defined and implemented but minor improvement is needed to fully meet them. Documents are available but no clear evidence to support that they have been fully used. Performance of the QA practice shows inconsistent or some results.

4. Adequate as expected

The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is adequate and evidences support that it has been fully implementedPerformance of the QA practice shows consistent results as expected.

5. Better than adequate

The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is better than adequate. Evidence supports that it (the QA practice) has been efficiently implemented. Performance of the QA practice shows good results and positive improvement trend.

6. Example of best practice

The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is considered to be example of best practices in the field. Evidences support that it has been effectively implemented
Performance of QA practice shows very good results and positive improvement trend.

7. Excellent (example of world-class or leading practice)

The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is considered to be excellent or is an example of world-class practices in the field. Evidences support that it has been innovatively implemented. 
Performance of the QA practice shows excellent results and outstanding improvement trends.

Guide to writing a self-assessment report (SAR)
  • The report is the account of the self-assessment. It is not only descriptive but also analytical. It identifies and evaluates the problems and also provides an indication of how the problems identified will be dealt with. (Use the diagnostic questions provided in each of the AUN-QA criteria to do this.)
  • Illustrate clearly what, where, when, who, and how the QA mechanisms or instruments are implemented and managed to fulfil the criteria. This will help to piece all related information together.
  • Focus on information and data (objective evidences) that directly address the criteria. The report has to be concise and factual. Provide trends and statistics to show achievement and performance.
What is the QA practice to fulfil the criterion?

Quality assurance practice should mean QA plan that evaluates and/or modifies organization’s procedures to ensure that they provide the desired results. The QA plan documents the planning, implementation and assessment procedures for a project, process or any QA activity.
The QA plan should provide information about some or all of the following.

  • An overview of the project or process describing background, need, scope, activities, and deadlines;
  • Quality objectives to be attained (for example, characteristics, effectiveness, cycle time, cost, etc.);
  • Steps in the process that constitute the operating practice or procedures of the organization;
  • Allocation of responsibilities, authority, and resources for different phases of the project/process;
  • Specific document describing standards, practices, procedures, and instructions to be applied;
  • Suitable testing, inspection, examination, and audit programs at appropriate stages;
  • A documented procedure for changes and modifications to a quality plan as a process is improved;
  • A method for measuring the achievement of the quality objectives;

    (Source: https://asq.org/quality-resources/quality-plans)

Operational Result

8.1 The pass rate, dropout rate, and average time to graduate are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

The BBA- AR program has a good foundation for the student’s study growth. The program committee monitors the student’s progression and dropouts to identify the necessary actions to improve the students and stabilize the students who joined the program.

The program committee meeting decided to take the initiative along with the marketing team to improve the student intake. So, all the lecturers were deputed to coordinate with the marketing team to guide the new students when they visit the college. The program committee conducts the orientation program every year to explain about the opportunities in the aviation field and career guidance to the AR students. So, the dropout is minimized, and the students are focused to join the core industries for their internships and jobs.

Pass Rate Analysis:

Academic Batch

Total Students

Students Passed

Pass Rate (%)

2017 – 2021

7

7

100

2018 – 2022

19

19

100

2019 – 2023

20

20

100

2020 – 2024

14

14

100

 

Dropout Rate Analysis:

Academic Year

Total Enrolled

Students Dropped out

Dropout Rate (%)

2020

52

38

73.07

2021

6

5

83.33

2022

6

6

100

2023

2

1

50

2024 (Intensive)

2

 

Average Time to Graduate Analysis:

Academic Batch

Total Graduates

Average Time to Graduate (in years)

2017 – 2021

7

4

2018 – 2022

19

4

2019 – 2023

20

4

2020 – 2024

14

4

 

8.2 Employability as well as self-employment, entrepreneurship, and advancement to further studies, are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

The college has a vision to provide graduates to have successful careers and a quality of life. Followed by the college’s vision and mission, the AR major implemented teaching strategies to provide 100 % core employment opportunities. So, the year 4 students’ emphasis to find the core companies for their internship training to get the knowledge to attain the industry standard to get a job easily. This strategy helped students to join the core companies like cargo, loadmasters in airlines, flight dispatching, and ground operations. Few students shows their interest to do higher studies to improve their aeronautics skills at the next level.

Employability Analysis:

Academic Batch

Total Graduates

Employed Graduates

Employment Rate (%)

2017 – 2021

7

7

100

2018 – 2022

19

18

94.74

2019 – 2023

20

15

75.00

2020 – 2024

14

10

71.43

 

Self-employment and Entrepreneurship Analysis:

Academic Batch

Total Graduates

Self-employed/Entrepreneurs

Self-employment Rate

2017 – 2021

7

7

0

2018 – 2022

19

0

0

2019 – 2023

20

5

25

2020 – 2024

14

4

28.57

 

Advancement to further studies Analysis:

Academic Batch

Total Graduates

Graduates pursuing further studies

Advancement Rate (%)

2017 – 2021

7

0

0

2018 – 2022

19

1

5.26

2019 – 2023

20

0

0

2020 – 2024

14

1

7.14

8.3 Research and creative work output and activities carried out by the academic staff and students, are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

The lecturers are doing quality research work every year with respect to their area of interest in the AR major. The research is integrated with their teaching subjects to discuss with the students to give more advanced knowledge in their field. The students also gain new normal learning skills from the lecturer’s research work.  The college research office assesses the lecturer’s research work to guide and give suggestions to complete the research successfully in terms of college standards. The lecturers are assigning integrated project work/ concern subject project works to improve the student’s learning skills, academic innovation, information, media and literacy skills. The student’s project/presentation works are evaluated by the subject experts from the major, other department faculty members, and management persons. By this evaluation method, students are improving their confidence level to do the presentation when they undergo the internship and the job. The major head and lecturer conducted the meetings/ workshops to improve the teaching and learning skills, TQF3 & TQF5, quality measurements of the internship, and knowledge sharing. Two lecturers submitted their research work to the internal committee to get approval.

  • Aj. Hari completed a research paper but waiting for the publisher’s response.
  • Aj. Praveen and Aj. Mari Prabu jointly wrote a research paper and awaiting for publisher’s
    response too.
  • Aj. Mari Prabu had wrote a book chapter titled “Use of Virtual Reality to Understand and
    experience virtual illusions while flying “ in the book “Innovative Pedagogy and Learner
    Centric Approaches in the Digital Era”.

Research Publications Analysis:

Academic Year

Total Publications

Publications Growth Rate

2019 – 2020

2

100

2020 – 2021

1

100

2021 – 2022

100

2022 – 2023

3

100

2023 – 2024

0

0

8.4 Data are provided to show directly the achievement of the programme outcomes, which are established and monitored.

To enhance the creativity and innovation skills of the students, the projects are assigned to use their subject knowledge in order to improve their creativity which is used in the real-time environment.

To improve the student’s cognitive skills, the lecturers assign assignments based on real-time situations, on a case-study basis, and study visits.

The students are experienced with the flight computer, simulator, preparing the PPT and project books by using computers, using the tabs to do their class works, and homework which helped to improve the student’s numerical and information literacy skills.

Students performed well during the internship with the help of their skills. So, they easily enter into the core industries/departments like airport operations, cargo operations, ground operations, loadmaster in airlines, logistics, etc.,

Some of the students started their own businesses to become an entrepreneurs. One student has undergone higher studies. Based on the student’s achievements the program learning outcome is obtained a satisfactory level with an overall score of 4 out of 5.

8.5 Satisfaction level of the various stakeholders are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

The satisfaction of the stakeholders is important to improve the curriculum and bridge the gap between the classroom and industry. To enhance the quality of the department, the AR major collected the stakeholder survey to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the classroom teaching learning skills. The other stakeholder’s needs were gathered through multiple methods that were appropriate for each group, such as discussions with current students, interviews with graduates & alumni, and interviews with supervisors, they surveyed the employers for their opinions regarding the graduates’, alumni’s performance, interviewed the academic staff of each course and the evaluation from the current graduates. All information was analyzed and categorized into formulated PLOs, which were congruent with the needs of the stakeholders.

Assessment scores

RequirementsSelf scoreAssessors’
8.1 The pass rate, dropout rate, and average time to graduate are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.1
8.2 Employability as well as self-employment, entrepreneurship, and advancement to further studies, are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.1
8.3 Research and creative work output and activities carried out by the academic staff and students, are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.1
8.4 Data are provided to show directly the achievement of the programme outcomes, which are established and monitored.1
8.5 Satisfaction level of the various stakeholders are shown to be established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.1
Overall5

Leave a Reply