Criterion 2 – Programme Structure and Content
AUNQA requirements for Criterion 2
2.1 Transparency
The specifications of the programme and all its courses are shown to be comprehensive, up-to-date, and made available and communicated to all Stakeholders.
Diagnostic questions
- How are the expected learning outcomes translated into the programme and courses?
- What information is documented in the programme and course specifications?
- How are their contents made up-to-date and comprehensive?
- What is the process for reviewing the programme and courses specifications?
- How are the programme specifications published and made available (or known) to stakeholders?
2.2 Alignment to learning outcomes
The design of the curriculum is shown to be constructively aligned with achieving the expected learning outcomes.
Diagnostic questions
- Do the contents of the programme reflect the ELOs?
- How are teaching and learning methods and student assessment selected to align with achieving the ELOs?
2.3 Stakeholders’ input
The design of the curriculum is shown to include feedback from stakeholders, especially external stakeholders.
Diagnostic questions
- What are the roles of the stakeholders in the design of the curriculum?
- What are external stakeholders’ feedback related to the curriculum?
- How are the feedback incorporated in designing the curriculum?
2.4 Course contribution
The contribution made by each course in achieving the expected learning outcomes is shown to be clear.
Diagnostic questions
- Does the content of each courses reflect the expected learning outcomes?
- How are the expected LOs allocated to the courses?
- How do the CLOs of each courses contribute to achieving PLOs?
2.5 Courses progression
The curriculum is required to show that all its courses are logically structured, properly sequenced (progression from basic to intermediate to specialized courses), and are integrated.
Diagnostic questions
- How are the courses logically structured and sequenced (progression from basic to advanced courses)?
- How are the courses integrated?
- Is there a logical relationship among the basic courses, intermediate courses and advanced courses? What is it?
2.6 Curriculum options
The curriculum is shown to have option(s) for students to pursue major and/or minor specializations.
Diagnostic questions
- How does the programme offer major and minor specialisations?
- Is there a proper balance between the specific and general courses?
- What is the explanation for the programme structure?
2.7 Curriculum review and improvement
The programme and its curriculum is reviewed periodically following an established procedure and that it remains up-to-date and relevant to industry.
Diagnostic questions
- What is the procedure for periodical review of the curriculum?
- How are the programme and courses evaluated? Is the evaluation systematic?
- How are the academic staff and students involved in evaluating the curriculum and courses?
- How are the programme and curriculum revised to remain up-to-date and industrial relevant? Is the external stakeholders involved?
- Is benchmarking used in the review and revision of the curriculum? What benchmark?
Scoring for TRSU QA
| TRSU-QA score | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Items showing QA practice | 1 item | 2 items | 3 items | 4-5 items | 6-7 items |
AUNQA scoring rubrics
A seven-point rating scale used for AUNQA assessment is described below.
1. Absolutely inadequate
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is not implemented.
There are no plans, documents, evidences or results available.
Immediate improvement must be made.
2. Inadequate and improvement is necessary
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is still at its planning stage or is inadequate where improvement is necessary.
There is little document or evidence available.
Performance of the QA practice shows little or poor results.
3. Inadequate but minor improvement will make it adequate
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is defined and implemented but minor improvement is needed to fully meet them. Documents are available but no clear evidence to support that they have been fully used. Performance of the QA practice shows inconsistent or some results.
4. Adequate as expected
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is adequate and evidences support that it has been fully implemented. Performance of the QA practice shows consistent results as expected.
5. Better than adequate
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is better than adequate. Evidence supports that it (the QA practice) has been efficiently implemented. Performance of the QA practice shows good results and positive improvement trend.
6. Example of best practice
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is considered to be example of best practices in the field. Evidences support that it has been effectively implemented.
Performance of QA practice shows very good results and positive improvement trend.
7. Excellent (example of world-class or leading practice)
The QA practice to fulfil the criterion is considered to be excellent or is an example of world-class practices in the field. Evidences support that it has been innovatively implemented.
Performance of the QA practice shows excellent results and outstanding improvement trends.
How to write a response to the criterion requirements
- The response should describe a QA practice that the program do to fulfil the criterion. The QA may be a PDCA (plan-do-check-act) process to ensure the quality, and include documentation, evidence and result of the implementation.
- The response should illustrate clearly what the QA mechanisms or instruments are; when, where, by who, and how they are implemented and managed to fulfil the criteria.
- The response should identify and evaluate problems or issues that are not addressed, and indicate how the problems will be dealt with. The diagnostic questions in each of the criterion requirements may help identify the problems.
- To be concise and factual, the response should focus on information or data (or objective evidence) that directly addresses the criteria, and provide trends and statistics to show achievement and performance.
How the QA practice fulfil the criterion
Quality assurance practice should have QA plan that evaluates and may modify organization’s procedures to ensure that they provide the desired results. It includes documentation for the planning, implementation and assessment procedures for a project, process or any QA activity. To fulfil requirement 1.1 Outcomes formulation, for example, the QA plan should provide information to answer the following questions.
- What procedure does the program use to formulate the expected learning outcomes?
- Is a learning taxonomy used to write the statement of LOs? What taxonomy and how is it used?
- Is the taxonomy used for program or course learning outcomes, or both? Why?
- What are the objectives in terms of the quality of the learning outcomes (e.g. transparency, ease of assessment, the extent of alignment, enabling hierarchy, effectiveness, clarity to the stakeholders)?
- What is the process used to ensure that the quality objectives are met?
- What is a method used to measure the achievement of the quality objectives?
Operational Results
2.1 The specifications of the programme and all its courses are shown to be comprehensive, up-to-date, and made available and communicated to all stakeholders.
We conduct regular review of the curriculum. Interviews and stakeholder discussions were done for the most recent revision in 2021. Three external experts in business administration also reviewed the revised program and course specifications, providing detailed recommendations to update them to meet the needs of current stakeholders.
The program specification (TQF2) and course specification (TQF3) contain detailed descriptions of the program specifications. They contain information that is helpful to present and prospective students as well as other stakeholders, and they comply with university guidelines. They consist of an overview of the program’s objectives and planned learning outcomes, course structure diagrams, a matrix outlining how the courses help students meet the PLOs, and a list of course requirements.
The course coordinator distributes and explains the course syllabus, which includes information on learning objectives, the teaching and learning methodology, assessment techniques, and the contents of each module, to each and every student during the orientation meeting before the course begins.
The TRSU website (https://www.stic.ac.th/postgraduate-program/business-administration), Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/sticpage), email, and Line were among the virtual channels used to inform external stakeholders (i.e., employers, undergraduate institutions, prospective students, alumni, and so on) about the program and course specifications. A marketing campaign run by a skilled marketing team in several provinces is also included in the communications. To spread the word, experts are taking part in both domestic and international education expos. Graduates of TRSU’s bachelor’s program are contacted via several channels to enroll in the MBA program.
On the first day of the semester, a current first-year student’s orientation session is arranged, and they receive an orientation booklet that includes all program and course specifications. All students are also informed of any modifications to the course content and requirements through online and in-person meetings held throughout the academic year. The program handbook and brochure are also given to the faculty members and program committee, and frequent in-person and virtual meetings are scheduled.
Table: Stakeholder communication channel
|
Stakeholders |
Communication Channels |
||
|
Meeting |
Document |
Social media |
|
|
Academic staff – Academic committee – All academic staff |
-Monthly -Annually – Course orientation |
Program manual / Course manual Meeting report |
Website |
|
Instructor of other faculties: – Faculty of Science – Faculty of Art – International School |
-Annually |
Program manual / Course manual Meeting report |
Website |
|
Current students |
-Biannually – Course orientation |
Program manual /Course manual |
Website / Facebook |
|
Potential students / parents |
Annually -Informal discussion |
Program manual |
Website / Facebook |
|
Employers |
-Informal discussion |
Program manual |
Website / Facebook |
|
Alumni |
-Informal discussion |
Program manual |
Website / Facebook |
2.2 The design of the curriculum is shown to be constructively aligned with achieving the expected learning outcomes.
In order to develop business executives, academics, or business researchers with high competency in business research, our MBA program’s curriculum is backwardly planned to be in line with the PLOs. Nine courses totaling 36 credits—24 credits for coursework and 12 credits for thesis work—are required to earn all four PLOs. Every year, a review of the curriculum is conducted by a variety of stakeholders, including employers, alumni, current students, and professors. The curriculum committee reviewed the PLOs in accordance with the demands of the stakeholders, as seen in the figure, after discussing the comments from the stakeholders during the monthly sessions.
2.3 The design of the curriculum is shown to include feedback from stakeholders, especially external stakeholders.
The program often requests input from the students on the courses it offers, which we utilize to adjust the curriculum and learning objectives. We update the assessment forms and rubric utilized for every school year based on the comment of the curriculum committee. We sent a survey on PLO accomplishment to MBA program graduate and their employers in the academic year 2023. The score for all items was indicating highly satisfactory performance. We are creating a new survey for the academic year 2024 and will distribute it to employers, alumni, and current MBA students in order to evaluate the skills required. Seven PLOs served as the source of such skills.
2.4 The contribution made by each course in achieving the expected learning outcomes is shown to be clear.
A matrix of CLOs and PLOs, Table 2, illustrates how each course contributed to meeting the PLOs. Every course either entirely or partially contributes to the PLOs. All Master of Business Administration course offerings prepare graduates for positions in academia, business leadership, education, and research that need an understanding of business management and business research techniques. Additionally, students gain useful skills by participation in a research project where they do mock research individually, participating in all stages of the process—including selecting a research topic, drafting a research proposal, exploring data gathering process, evaluation methods and compiling a report—with assistance from experts. One of the primary courses where students can merge their knowledge, attitude, and research abilities is thesis work. We provide proper supervision for the activities this course.
|
Courses |
Subject specific LOs |
Generic LOs |
||||||
|
PLO2 |
PLO3 |
PLO4 |
PLO7 |
PLO1 |
PLO5 |
PLO6 |
||
|
Cognitive / Applying |
Cognitive / Applying |
Cognitive / Applying |
Psychomotor / Articulate |
Affective / Valuing |
Affective / Valuing |
Psychomotor / Articulate |
||
|
Foundation Courses |
||||||||
|
Foundation in Business Administration |
||||||||
|
Principles of Accounting |
||||||||
|
Required Courses |
||||||||
|
Business Economics |
||||||||
|
Accounting and Financial Management |
||||||||
|
Modern Human Resource Management |
||||||||
|
Marketing Management in Digital Age |
||||||||
|
Business Research |
||||||||
|
Competitive Strategy |
||||||||
|
Digital Technology for Business |
||||||||
|
Seminar in Management |
||||||||
|
Thesis |
||||||||
2.5 The curriculum to show that all its courses are logically structured, properly sequenced (progression from basic to intermediate to specialised courses), and are integrated.
The training of human resources in business management and business research is the focus of this curriculum. The foundation courses, core courses, elective courses, and thesis are all included into the MBA program’s course curriculum. From basic to advanced course modules, the course is rationally organized, sequenced, and integrated across the program. Before the more difficult courses start in Semester 2, the basic courses begin and end in Semester 1 of the first year. During the first semester of the Master of Business Administration program, non-business students are required to take foundation courses such as Foundation in Business Administration and Principles of Accounting. They make it possible for learners from various backgrounds to acclimate to the program’s teaching and learning methods. After foundation courses, students have to study 7 core courses and one elective course. Core courses are Business Economics, Accounting and Financial Management, Modern Human Resource Management, Marketing Management, Competitive Strategy, and Digital Technology for Business. Students can put the lessons they’ve learned in their core courses into practice in Business Research by creating and carrying out a genuine research project with input from stakeholders and applying their problem-solving skills in real-world scenarios.
Before beginning their thesis in their second year, first-year students must pass all 24 credits of study. The thesis shows that the student is capable of carrying out carefully thought-out, internationally recognized research. Before being presented to the committee, the proposal is discussed and improved in group settings while the coursework advances concurrently. Students typically need two semesters to finish the thesis procedure from start to finish. Particular talents, morality, teamwork, communication, lifelong learning, and job skills are imparted in each course of the curriculum through group projects, field work, oral presentations, and discussions.
2.6 The curriculum to have option(s) for students to pursue major and/or minor specialisations.
Research is the core of the Master of Business Administration program. By creating their own research projects using primary data gathering in their respective areas, managing and analyzing data, and producing theses and publication articles, students gain research skills that are applicable to their future employment. This thesis research project encourages students to specialize in either a major or minor area of study for their future careers. Graduates of the Master of Business Administration program could expect a significant increase in employability. In order to ensure that they are working on the same thesis topic, students are paired as closely as possible with academic staff members for thesis supervision.
2.7 The programme to show that its curriculum is reviewed periodically following an established procedure and that it remains up-to-date and relevant to industry.
The Ministry of Higher Education, Sciences, Research and Innovation (MHESI) mandates that the program curriculum be changed either constantly or at least every five years of operation. Additionally, we discuss course content and teaching-learning strategies in the regular meetings of the academic staff to ensure that they are current and fulfill the needs of stakeholders as well as the demands of the situation. One notable example is the incorporation of information about the COVID-19 pandemic and such emergency situations, preventive, and control strategies in classes, discussions, and student research projects for their theses. The curriculum committee also keeps an eye on and reviews the programs’ general operations each year, taking into account both the positive and negative aspects. They also gather input from stakeholders, particularly academics and students, and utilize this data to guide the next round of curriculum revisions. As a result, we are certain that the program curriculum is current and appropriate for the demands of stakeholders.
The latest formal revision of the curriculum was done in 2021.
Evidence
| ID_Evidence | Name_Evidence |
| 2.1-1 | TQF2 |
| 2.1-2 | TQF3 |
| 2.1-3 | Orientation program |
| 2.1-4 | Curriculum revision meeting |
| 2.2-1 | Curriculum alignment with PLOs |
| 2.3-1 | Graduate survey |
| 2.3-2 | Graduate user survey |
| 2.7-1 | TQF2 |
| 2.7-2 | Program committee meeting |
Self-Assessment
| Requirements | Result | Score |
| 2.1 The specifications of the programme and all its courses are shown to be comprehensive, up-to-date, and made available and communicated to all stakeholders. | / | 1 |
| 2.4 The contribution made by each course in achieving the expected learning outcomes is shown to be clear. | / | |
| 2.2 The design of the curriculum is shown to be constructively aligned with achieving the expected learning outcomes. | / | 1 |
| 2.3 The design of the curriculum is shown to include feedback from stakeholders, especially external stakeholders. | / | |
| 2.5 The curriculum to show that all its courses are logically structured, properly sequenced and integrated. | / | 1 |
| 2.6 The curriculum to have option(s) for students to pursue major and/or minor specialisations. | / | 1 |
| 2.7 The programme to show that its curriculum is reviewed periodically following an established procedure and that it remains up-to-date and relevant to industry. | / | 1 |
| Overall | 5 | |