Component 9: Outputs and Outcomes

Indicator 9.1 Educational Management Results (Output and Outcomes)

For criteria 6 and 7, it is assessed using the Office of Permanent Secretary of Higher Education, Science, Research, and Innovations standards.

Score 1Score 2Score 3 Score 4Score 5
Has action 1 item Has action 2 itemHas action 3-4 itemHas action 5-6 item Has action 7 item

AUN-QA based criteria

AUN-QA Criterion 8 – Output and Outcomes

For AUN-QA, criteria 1 to 6 are assessed at 7 levels.

Performance

1. The pass rate, dropout rate, and average time to graduate are established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

There is an established system in the program to keep track of students’ performance, dropout, and graduate rates. The following table shows the number of students in different academic years including the change in student numbers. 

Number of Students who were admitted and
enrolled per Academic Year
Year of Admission Number of Students Enrolled Intensive
Enrollment
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 No. of Graduates Drop out Percentage
     
No.of students per year
 
       
2018 27 15 12 9 8 7 5 53.53%
2019 15 6 4 3 2 2 2 66.67%
2020 18 7 4 3 3 3 57.10%
2021 2 100%
2022 9 3 3 100%
Total 44 16 11 6 5 5 2 75.46%

The program committee meeting decided to take the initiative along with the marketing team to improve the student intake. So, one of the lecturers was deputed to coordinate with the marketing team to guide the new students when they visit the college. The program committee conducts the orientation program every year to explain about the opportunities in the aviation field and career guidance to the students. So, the dropout is minimized, and the students are focused to join the core industries for their internship and job.

2. Employability, self-employment, and advancement to further studies are established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

The program has a system and mechanism for student employability to benchmark, monitor and further develop the system based on the outcomes. All the graduates are 100 % employed in Accounting, and Audit Firm which is the main reflection of the program’s Mission and Vision of STIC B.Acc.

The employment rate of the graduate in the last five year
Academic
graduate on year
Number of
graduates
Get a job /
self-employed
Percentage of
employment
2018
2019
2020 2 2 100 %
2021 5 5 100 %
2022 2 2 100 %

Employment Status by the STIC Accounting Graduates:

No. Grad. Year Student ID Student’s Name Company
1 2020 172231001 SUPHANAN KAEWNOY Bara Windsor Company
2 2020 172231002 Piyapat Sriwoarakul MUANG THAI Life Insurance
3 2021 182231001 PHIRAIPORN SAEHER
Dream Destiny Company (DDES Accounting)
4 2021 182231005 RUNGPLOY NETKLIN Karin Audit
5 2021 182231009 SUPHITCHAYA WANTHONGSUK Rodl & Partner, Ltd.
6 2021 182231011 BANTITA PAINSAP
Land and Houses Company Limited
7 2021 182231012 SUPANNEE BANGKERD
Baltiphong Securit Company Limited (new)
8 2022 192231004 MOOKRADA NISANTA PK Audit Limited
9 2022 192231002 SUNISA JANSONGSRI PK Audit Limited

3. Research and creative work output and activities carried out by the academic staff and students are established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

As per the requirement of our academic programs, all of the students must enroll in research courses during their 4 years of study plan.

The curriculum has a research and innovation plan and a meeting to follow up on the research and innovation work of instructors before the start of the academic year to know the research needs and innovations of the faculty . Program instructors are encouraged to conduct cross-sectional research and explore external research funds from various sources. The research progress is monitored periodically in order to know the results before the end of the academic year and send the results to the research department of the college. 

As for students, the thesis course is designed to conduct research on real-world business problems. The instructor in seminar course and thesis advisor support students to pass through the different stages of research work.

4. Data are provided to show directly the achievement of the program outcomes, which are established and monitored.

The Bachelor of Accountancy program’s expected outcomes are attained by the graduates, including mean score of perceived achievement of overall PLOs more than 4.00 of 5.00, the average time to graduate is between 4 to 5 years, and percentage of employment is 100%.

The results of the satisfaction of employers towards our student performance show that program expected learning outcomes are achieved. The faculty has conducted employer’s Satisfaction of our student’s performance at work. The average score of the survey in the three (3) categories is Very Good Satisfaction.

As shown in the data below, the assessment results of student’s learning outcomes in all aspects are higher than 3.51

The five 5 aspects of learning outcomes in accordance with the Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education are based on the Employers.  The table below shows the graduate quality assessment:

1. Learning outcome 5 domain (Moral and Ethics, Knowledge, Cognitive Skill, Interpersonal Skill, Numerical and IT Skill)

Five (5) Learning Outcomes
Program
Bachelor of Accountancy
1. Moral and Ethics 4.1
2. Knowledge Skill 3.9
3. Cognitive Skill 4
4. Interpersonal Skill 4.3
5. Numerical and Information Technology Skill 3.9
Average 4.04

2. Three aspects of learners’ outcomes in accordance with the ONESQA (Person Learner, Co-creator, and Active Global Citizen)

ONESQA Learning
Program
Bachelor of Accountancy
1. Learner Person  4.30
2. Co-creator  3.90
3. Active citizen  4.50
Average  4.23

3. Basic skills in English and 21st-century learning outcome:

21st Century and English Skills
Program
Bachelor of Accountancy
1. English Language   4.00
2. Learning skills and innovation   4.10
3. Media and technology skills   3.90
4. Skills in living and profession   4.00
Average   4.00

Evidence:

 Employment Survey Results of Graduates

5.  Satisfaction levels of the various stakeholders are established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.

The course has a process of collecting the opinions of stakeholders through a survey process using an online system. The curriculum collects opinions from stakeholders in order to improve the teaching and learning process to meet the needs. 

Primarily two major stakeholders are involved in providing opinions on different aspects, the faculty members and the students. 

The program committee considers all the survey seriously and keep an eye on the scores. Any satisfaction score below 3.51 is raised to the program meeting and immediately addressed to improve the situation.

6. Academic services outcomes / providing local and social benefits are shown.

The program prepares an annual academic service to the community plan to conduct service towards society. The program committee overseas progress of the actual activity according to the plan and evaluates the effectiveness of the activities by a questionnaire survey. 

The program students, under the supervision of the academic staff conducted a social service towards the local small business. The findings of the activity helped the businesses to improve their process to become more efficient.

7. Arts and culture learning outcomes are shown.

The curriculum sets an annual arts and culture learning plan. Follow-up meetings are held periodically to help suggest ways to achieve arts and cultural learning according to the plan. 

In the academic year 2022, the curriculum has implemented art projects. Art and culture in total 2 projects:

1 ) International Accounting Day, 

2) Thai cultural heritage project (Songkran Day).

Self-Assessment

Goal

Performance (Qualitative KPI (items))

Self-Assessment

…5 item…

IQA(1-7)

1,2,3,4,5,6,7

7-item

5-mark

AUN-QA(1-5)

1,2,3,4,5

level -3

Evidence

Evidence No.List of Evidences
9.1.1.1Pass rate and Dropout rate and average graduate period
9.1.1.2Employment Survey Results of Graduates
9.1.1.3Research and Creative Work Output
9.1.1.4Employment Survey Results of Graduates
9.1.1.5satisfaction of employees to graduates
9.1.1.6Academic Services Outcomes
9.1.1.7Arts and Culture Learning Outcomes are Shown

Indicator 9.2 Graduates quality

Performance


The average score of graduate user evaluation results = 4.41

The average satisfaction of employees to graduates (ACC) N = 2
 
Topic Mean
1. Learning outcome 5 domain (TQF) 4.25
2. Learning outcome (3 indicators) 4.33
3. Basic skills in English and 21stlearning outcome 4.65
Total average 4.41

Evidence:

Graduate User Evaluation Report

Self-Assessment

Self-Assessment

Goal

Performance (Qualitative KPI (items))

Self-Assessment

Average Score > 3.51

IQA(1)

Graduate user evaluation score average

4.41 mark

AUN-QA(ไม่มี)

None

level …none….

Evidence

Evidence No.List of evidences
9.2.1.1Satisfaction of employees to graduates

Indicator 9.3 Employability/Graduates research output Publications

Evidence

Out of 5 Bachelor Graduates, 5 of them were employed.

  1. Percentage of Bachelor Graduates who are employed or self-employed in 1 year = (Number of Bachelor Graduates who are employed or self-employed within 1 year/ Total number of graduate survey respondents) x 100

    Percentage of Bachelor graduates who are employed or self-employed in 1 year = (5/5) x 100 = 100%

  2. Score = (Percentage of Graduates who are employed or self-employed in 1 year/100) x 5

    Score = (100/100) x 5 = 5

 

 

ตารางแสดงการได้งานทำหรือประกอบอาชีพภายใน 1 ปี (หลักสูตรระดับปริญญาตรี)

ItemsQuantity
1. Total number of Bachelor degree graduates. 5
2. The number of Bachelor degree responds to the survey of employment within 1 year after graduation. 5
3. The number of Bachelor degree graduates who are employed after graduation (not included self-employed persons) 5
4. The number of Bachelor degree graduates who are self-employed.
5. The number of Bachelor degree graduates who were already employed before studying in the program.
6. The number of Bachelor degree graduates who continued thesis further studies in graduate Education level.
7. Salary per month on monthly income of Bachelor degree graduates who were employed on Self-employed (mean) 21,200 THB.
8. Satisfaction assessment scores toward graduates quality in accordance with the Thai Qualification framework for Higher Education (mean full score = 5) 4.41
9. Number of Bachelor degree graduates who owned their business with regular incomes.
10. Number of Bachelor degree graduates who ordained as monks.
11. Number of Bachelor degree graduates who were drafted into the military.

Self-Assessment

Goal

Performance (Qualitative KPI (items))

Self-Assessment

Percentage 100

IQA(1)

Bachelors

จำนวนผู้มีงานทำใน 1 ปี/จำนวนผู้สำเร็จการศึกษา

Percentage 100

5 mark

Masters/Doctoral

ผลรวมถ่วงน้ำหนักผลงาน/จำนวนผู้สำเร็จการศึกษา

Percentage- 

– mark

AUN-QA(None)

none

Level…none….

Evidence

Evidence No.List of evidences
9.3.1.1 Alumni and Graduate’s Job Status

Self-Assessment

Self-AssessmentIQAAUN-QA
Indicator 9.1…5……3…
Indicator 9.2 …4.41…
Indicator 9.3 …5…
Overall Average score...4.80...

Leave a Reply