Component 3: Indicator 3.2 Engagement (Customer Engagement)

Component 3 Students and Customers

Indicator 3.2 Engagement (Customer Engagement)

MHESI IQA (Items 1-8) assessment is indicated in the table below

1 mark2 marks3 marks4 marks 5 marks
1 item2 items3-4 items 5-6 items 7-8 items

According to EdPEx standard, the total score to assess items 1-6 is 45 marks, the factors used to evaluate the process are ADLI.

Performance

1. Student and Other Customer Relationships and Support (Relationship Management). How does the faculty build and manage student and other customer relationships?

The Faculty analyzes each groups of customers to create the effective ways to build and manage the relationship with the customers.

Customers

Objectives

Relationship-building Procedures

Education Management

Current students

1. Create a positive attitude towards

programs and Faculty

2. Transfer knowledge and be a professional training center

1. Relationship-building activities (orientations / extra-activities)

2. Projects 

(1 time/semester)

Prospective students

  To encourage them to be interested in and desire to study the programs of the Faculty

1. Creating PowerPoint to introduce the Faculty and BE and CA programs to school students in different regions via the College’s marketing team.

2. Publicizing received rewards, achievements, and academic success on the faculty fan page and website

 Graduates

1. to encourage a sense of belonging

2. to disseminate authentic work experiences, and working guideline

1. Homecoming event

2. Being guests in fourth-year orientation

3. Graduate network (HS 43)

Graduate Users

1. To initiate/maintain the relationship

2. To request help/expertise

1. Visiting an organization/company

2. Contacting through graduates

Academic Service / Community Service

Schools receive academic service

1. To serve their needs as requested (specific)

2. To provide knowledge helping to improve their students

1. Organizing activities

2. Evaluating satisfaction

Communities receive service

1. To familiarize with the communities

2. To inform the benefits they will get

1. Organizing activities

2. Disseminating the outputs via social media

หลักฐาน

3.2.1.1 นศ ปัจจุบัน HS 03/04/05/06/07/08/15/17/18/20/22/32/35/36/37

3.2.1.2 บัณฑิต HS 14/43/ Line group

3.2.1.3 บริการวิชาการ/ชุมชน HS 26/27/28/29/30/31

2. Student and Other Customer Relationships and Support (Student and Other Customer Access and Support). How does the faculty enable students and other Customers to seek information and support?

After the relationship management analysis is done, the Dean, Program Heads, and the academic-service committee consider the way enables the customers to access the Faculty’s information, and receive support from the Faculty.

Customers

Communication Channel

Support

Education Management

Current Students

– Faculty and College website /Faculty’s Facebook page/Line / faculty phone /advisor / Student Handbook / bulletin board

– Scholarships / learning facilities / extra-curricular activities / consultation / official documents /code of conduct for students

Prospective Students

– Faculty and College website / Faculty’s Facebook page/Line / faculty phone / publicizing the BE and CA programs and Faculty via the marketing process

– Scholarships / learning facilities /  extra-curricular activities / consultation / official documents / code of conduct for students / living-a-campus-life advice

Graduates

Faculty and College website / Faculty’s Facebook page/Line / faculty phone

– Updated curriculum information / Career Guideline

Graduate Users

– Faculty and College website /Faculty’s Facebook page/Line / faculty phone /internship observer

– – Updated curriculum information

Research

Faculty members

– Research committee / MIS / College research mentoring system

Research database, research consultation / research and publication funding / Recognition letter for research endeavor success

Academic and Community Service

– Research collaborators

– Schools/communities

Faculty and College website / Faculty’s Facebook page/Line / faculty phone / field visit / Research – responsible faculty members

News of academic service activities / local personnel development training / consulting of project implementation

หลักฐาน

3.2.2.1 นศ. ปัจจุบัน คู่มือนศ/ Facebook Fan page/ Line group/คำสั่งแต่งอาจารย์ที่ปรึกษา/ ป้ายประชาสัมพันธ์ต่างๆ

3.2.2.2 นศ. ในอนาคต PowerPoint ประชาสัมพันธ์หลักสูตร

3.2.2.3 ศิษย์เก่า HS 14/ 43/ Line group

3.2.2.4 อาจารย์: คำสั่งแต่งตั้งคณะกรรมการวิจัย / HS 23/24/25, Recognition letter for research endeavor success

3.2.2.5 Academic Service/Community Service: HS 26/27/28/29/30/31

3. Student and Other Customer Relationships and Support (Complaint Management). How does the faculty manage student and other customer complaints?

As stated precisely in both curriculum manuals, the Faculty has a process to deal with complaints until the complaints are successfully settled.

Complainer

Complaint Recipient

Channel for Complaint

Complaint Resolution

Complaint Result Report

Current students

Advisors

– Meet in person/ file complaints via Line

– Advisors meet with Program Heads/  Associate Dean/Dean

– Advisors inform students of complaint resolution result

Graduates

Associate Dean

– Meet in person/ file complaints via Line or telephone

– Associate Dean meets with Dean

– Associate Dean informs students of complaint resolution results

Faculty members

Associate Dean / Dean

– Meet in person/ file complaints via Line or telephone

– Faculty members filing complaints meet with and discuss the complaints with Associate Dean and Dean

Associate Dean/Dean informs complaint resolution results

Graduate Users

Program Heads / Associate Dean

– File complaints via Line/telephone

– Associate Dean meets with Dean

– Associate Dean informs  complaint resolution results

หลักฐาน

3.2.3.1 การรับข้อรร้องเรียน

3.2.3.2 Line ติดต่อระหว่างนศ. กับอาจารย์

4. Determination of Student and Other Customer Satisfaction and Engagement (Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and engagement). How does the faculty determine student and other Customer satisfaction, dissatisfaction, and engagement?

The Faculty relies on different sets of questionnaires using a Likert scale of 5 to assess (dis)satisfaction levels. For customer engagement, there is no specific questionnaire to assess this issue; hence, the Faculty analyzes the engagement indirectly from the existing questionnaire, project/activity participation, and interview.

Customers

(Dis)Satisfaction

Engagement

Assessment Tool

Responsible Person

Assessment Tool

Responsible Person

Education Management

Current students

– Instructional assessment questionnaire

– Project assessment questionnaire

– Program Heads

– Project-responsible persons

– Participation in projects/activities

– Q/A for suggestions

– Project-responsible persons

– Advisors / Program Heads

Graduates

– Employment survey questionnaire

– Curriculum improvement questionnaire

– Associate Dean

– Dean

– Being guests to meet with current students

– Join the Alumni Line Group

– Dean

– Secretary

– Alumni-Line-group-responsible person

Graduate Users

– Internship-assessment questionnaire

– Interview

– Associate Dean

– Q/A for suggests

– High questionnaire rate

– Associate Dean

– Secretary

Academic/Community Service

Schools/ community receiving services

– Questionnaire assessing service quality

– Q/A for suggestions

– Academic- Service responsible person

-Community- Service responsible person

– Continuous participation in an academic service project

– Providing facility and feedback

 

หลักฐาน

3.2.4.1 ผลการประเมินหลักสูตร

3.2.4.2 ผลการประเมินโครงการที่นศมีส่วนร่วมของนศ

3.2.4.3 การติดตามผลบัณฑิต

3.2.4.4 ผล internship

5. Determination of Student and Other Customer Satisfaction and Engagement (Satisfaction Relative to Other Organizations).  How does the faculty obtain information on students’ and other Customers’ satisfaction with your organization relative to other organizations?

The Faculty has done the ‘Quality Criteria’ regarding the methods to search for (dis)satisfaction and engagement as mentioned earlier. However, the ‘Quality Criteria’ of Satisfaction Relative to Other Organizations has not been exactly done. Thus, in order to improve the work process more competently in the future, the Faculty plans to obtain information from the Faculty of Education of St. Theresa International College, or from other Faculties in Social Sciences sharing similar contexts.

6. Use of voice-of-the-Customer and Market Data. How does the faculty use voice-of-the-customer and market data and information?

The Faculty determines the guidelines to exploit customers’ opinions/suggestions and market data as the sources for operational improvement.

Customers

Guidelines for Using Customers’ Opinions/Suggestions, Market Data

Information Users

Education Management

Current students

1. Analyze and summarize data used for teaching improvement

2. Exploit obtained data for curriculum improvement

– Dean

– Program Heads

Graduates

– Use the data to assess faculty performance for improvement for design for the following year

– Use the data for curriculum improvement

– Dean

– Program Heads

Graduate Users

– Assessment results are analyzed to find guidelines for curriculum development to meet the demands of the workforce market.

– Dean

– Program Heads

Research

Faculty members

1. To improve the research support mechanism

2. To encourage more research work

– Research Committee

Academic and Community Service

Schools/communities receive the service

1. Analyze problems and needs of schools/ communities receiving services as sources for project improvement

2. Analyze the results for a new plan/activity for the next year

– Academic-Service Committee

หลักฐาน

3.2.6.1 ผลการประเมิน จากแบบสอบถามของ นศ.

3.2.6.2 กิจกรรมศิษย์เก่าพบนศ.

3.2.6.3 ข้อแนะนำ ผลการประเมินบัณฑิต ของผู้มีส่วนได้ส่วนเสีย

3.2.3.4 Research publication/research fund

3.2.3.5 ผลการประเมินการบริการวิชาการ /บริการชุมชน

7. Supervising the assessment of learning outcomes and student development.

By the end of the academic year, the Faculty requests all-year students in both programs to 1) evaluate themselves regarding ‘5 TQF outcomes‘, ‘5 learning outcomes’, ‘three learner outcomes’, ‘21st Century skills’, ‘English application competence’, ‘moral and ethic outcomes’, and 2) evaluate the curricula and teaching.

The Faculty analyze and adopt the evaluation results as sources for pedagogical improvement as evidenced by the increasing evaluation rate year after year (2019 – 2021)   

หลักฐาน

3.2.7.1 ผลการประเมินตนเองและหลักสูตรของ นศ.

3.2.7.2 ผลการประเมิน IQA ทั้งสองหลักสูตรย้อนหลัง 3 ปี

8. Providing counseling services and taking care of students to succeed in their studies.

The Faculty appoints advisors each of whom is responsible for specified–year students. Their duty covers the following:

  1. Meeting with their advisees for 2 hours on a weekly basis
  2. Providing advice on academic and personal issues
  3. Following up on their advisees’ study results
  4. Arranging a personal meeting with some advisees requiring personal talk
  5. Arranging students requiring special advice to meet with the Associate Dean or Dean
  6. Writing a summary report

หลักฐาน

3.2.8.1 คำสั่งแต่งตั้งและตารางเวลาอาจารย์ที่ปรึกษา

3.2.8.2 รายงานสรุปของาจารย์ที่ปรึกษา

Self-Assessment

Goal

Performance

Qualitative indicators

(indicated items)

Self-Assessment

5 items 

IQA (1-8)

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

8 items

 5 marks

EdPEx (1-6)

1,2,3,4,5,6,7

 Percentage 10

4.5 marks

Evidence

Evidence No.List of evidences
3.2.1 3.2.1.1 นศ ปัจจุบัน HS 03/04/05/06/07/08/15/17/18/20/22/32/35/36/37
3.2.1.2 บัณฑิต HS 14/43/ Line group
3.2.1.3 บริการวิชาการ/ชุมชน HS 26/27/28/29/30/31
3.2.2 3.2.2.1 นศ. ปัจจุบัน คู่มือนศ/ Facebook Fan page/ Line group/คำสั่งแต่งอาจารย์ที่ปรึกษา/ ป้ายประชาสัมพันธ์ต่างๆ
3.2.2.2 นศ. ในอนาคต PowerPoint ประชาสัมพันธ์หลักสูตร
3.2.2.3 ศิษย์เก่า HS 14/ 43/ Line group
3.2.2.4 อาจารย์: คำสั่งแต่งตั้งคณะกรรมการวิจัย / HS 23/24/25, Recognition letter for research endeavor success
3.2.2.5 Academic Service/Community Service: HS 26/27/28/29/30/31
3.2.3 3.2.3.1 การรับข้อรร้องเรียน
3.2.3.2 Line ติดต่อระหว่างนศ. กับอาจารย์
3.2.4 3.2.4.1 ผลการประเมินหลักสูตร
3.2.4.2 ผลการประเมินโครงการที่นศมีส่วนร่วมของนศ
3.2.4.3 การติดตามผลบัณฑิต
3.2.4.4 ผล internship
3.2.5
3.2.6 3.2.6.1 ผลการประเมิน จากแบบสอบถามของ นศ.
3.2.6.2 กิจกรรมศิษย์เก่าพบนศ.
3.2.6.3 ข้อแนะนำ ผลการประเมินบัณฑิต ของผู้มีส่วนได้ส่วนเสีย
3.2.3.4 Research publication/research fund
3.2.3.5 ผลการประเมินการบริการวิชาการ /บริการชุมชน
3.2.7 3.2.7.1 ผลการประเมินตนเองและหลักสูตรของ นศ.
3.2.7.2 ผลการประเมิน IQA ทั้งสองหลักสูตรย้อนหลัง 3 ปี
3.2.8 3.2.8.1 คำสั่งแต่งตั้งและตารางเวลาอาจารย์ที่ปรึกษา
3.2.8.2 รายงานสรุปของาจารย์ที่ปรึกษา

Self-Assessment

Self-Assessment IQAEdPEx
Indicator 3.154
Indicator 3.254.5
Overall Average Score(IQA)/
Overall Score (EdPEx)
58.5