Indicator 2.1. Expected Learning Outcomes
For criteria 6 and 7, it is assessed using the Office of Permanent Secretary of Higher Education, Science, Research, and Innovations standards.
| Score 1 | Score 2 | Score 3 | Score 4 | Score 5 |
| Has action 1 item | Has action 2 item | Has action 3-4 item | Has action 5-6 item | Has action 7 item |
AUN-QA based criteria
For AUN-QA, criteria 1 to 5 are assessed at 7 levels.
Operational Result
1. Expected learning outcomes are formulated and communicated
The Program Expected Learning Outcomes ( PLOs) are carefully designed based on Educational taxonomy and are aligned to the Faculty and University’s vision and mission ; communicated to all lecturers and students. There are (5) five Program Learning Outcome for general Education namely:
1.1 General Education
1.1.1 Moral & Ethics
1.1.2 Knowledge
1.1.3 Cognitive
1.1.4 Interpersonal and Responsibility
1.1. 5 Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology
There are total of (6) six Program Learning Outcomes for the specialised courses, namely:
1.2 Specialised Courses
1.2.1 Moral & Ethics
1.2.2 Knowledge
1.2.3 Cognitive Skills
1.2.4 Interpersonal and Responsibility
1.2.5 Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology
1.2.6Learning Management Methodology
The above-mentioned Program Learning Outcomes are aligned with the University’s Vision & Mission below.
Mission :
1) To produce graduates with high performance in academic, professional and English language.
2) Develop research and academic works to be recognized at the national and international level
3) Develop a Center of Excellence in Academic, Professional and English Language
4) Preserve Thai and international arts and cultures to become a multicultural society.
5) Manage the organization towards excellence.
Vision :
To be a leading university nationally and internationally recognized.
At the beginning of each semester, the head of the program conducts meeting with all lecturers to communicate the following:
- Vision, Mission and Philosophy of the Faculty
- Program Learning Outcomes
- Year- Level learning Outcomes In the meeting, formulation of specific learning outcomes for each course is being discussed. The faculty of has been doing this for years and it has been observed , based on the instructors tqf3, the the instructors have a good understanding of the Program Learning Outcomes.
2. Designed expected learning outcomes are appropriate with the learning management
Each course has designated learning outcomes which are aligned with established program learning outcomes. The academic staff , then, carefully design teaching-learning activities to achieve the course learning outcomes ( CLOs) of the course. The Course Learning Outcomes are communicated through our TQF 3 and TQF 4. The lectures them formulate specific classroom learning outcomes to achieve the required learning outcomes for each course. Year Learning Outcomes ( YLOs ) and are aligned with Generic Learning Outcomes and the learning Management.
Evaluation and Improvement Plan
Each lecturer has to evaluate and report whether each established course learning outcomes is achieved or not at the end of the semester through TQF 5 and TQF 6. The lecturer discusses the problems encountered and suggest plan to further improve the program.
3. Generic learning outcomes and specific learning outcomes are formulated.
The program has formulated both the General and specific learning outcomes for the program and the courses as seen in the curriculum Mapping. These general and specific learning outcomes regularly evaluated and improved based on the feedback of students, instructors and stakeholders.
Evaluation and Improvement Plan
The Program Generic Learning Outcomes are continuously improve to meet the demand of stakeholders. The Program determines the achievement of our Program learning Outcome (PLOs ) and Course Learning Outcomes ( CLOs) through our TQF 5 and TQF 4 submitted by the teacher at the end of the semester.
4. Expected learning outcomes meet the requirement of external stakeholders
All Learning outcomes are formulated based on the suggestions of different stakeholders, including external stakeholders. The table below shows the summary of the evaluation results of our graduates :
- The table below shows the graduates quality assessment:
- Six (6 ) Aspects of Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcomes
Mean
Level
Evidence
1. Ethical & Moral Devt.
4.21
Very High Employers Satisfaction Survey Form
2.Knowledge Skills
4.24
Very High
3. Cognitive Skills
4.12
High
4. Interpersonal Skills
3.89 Very High 5. Analytical and Use of IT Skills
4.22
Very High
6. Professional Skills ( Teaching Skills)
Total:
4.23
4.15
Very High
High
Based on the employer’s evaluation, our alumni got a weighted mean of 4.15 or high satisfaction on the six (6) aspects of learning outcomes.
Legend:
4.21-5.00- Very High Satisfaction
3.41-4.20- High Satisfaction
2.61-3.40-Moderate Satisfaction
1.81-2.60- Low Satisfaction
1.00-1.80- Very Low Satisfaction
From the above result of the evaluation of our stakeholders, we can conclude that our Program Learning Outcomes meet the requirements of our stakeholders.
5. The expected learning outcomes are achieved by the students by the time they graduate
The expected learning outcomes are achieved by the students before they graduate as indicated in the result of school mentors and college’s supervisor of our graduating students.
School Mentor’s and College’s Supervisor Evaluation Summary of our Senior Students
Table 1: Summary of School Mentor’s Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
|
|
1. Moral & Ethics |
3.81 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
2. Knowledge |
3.93 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
3. Cognitive Skills |
3.67 |
High Satisfaction |
|
4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility |
3.74 |
High Satisfaction |
|
5. Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology |
3.56 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
6. Learning Management Skills |
3.89 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
Overall Mean |
3.76 |
High Satisfaction |
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
|
|
1. Moral & Ethics |
3.59 |
High Satisfaction |
|
2. Knowledge |
3.57 |
High Satisfaction |
|
3. Cognitive Skills |
3.63 |
High Satisfaction |
|
4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility |
3.91 |
High Satisfaction |
|
5. Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology |
3.75 |
High Satisfaction |
|
6. Learning Management Skills |
3.81 |
High Satisfaction |
|
Overall Mean |
3.71 |
High Satisfaction |
Table 2: Summary of College’s Supervisor Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes
The (2) two tables above show the result of our partner schools, where are our senior students conduct their internship, and our internship supervisor evaluation our senior students performance. From the above results of evaluation, we can conclude that our our expected learning outcomes are achieved by our students by the time they graduate.
6. The assessment result of students’ learning outcomes in 4 aspects: knowledge, skills, morals and ethics, and personal characteristics from each level have to be higher than 3.51
As show in the date below, the assessment results of students learning outcomes in all aspects is higher than 3.51
Mentor’s and College’s Supervisor Evaluation Summary of our Senior Students
Table 1: Summary of School Mentor’s Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
|
|
1. Moral & Ethics |
3.81 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
2. Knowledge |
3.93 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
3. Cognitive Skills |
3.67 |
High Satisfaction |
|
4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility |
3.74 |
High Satisfaction |
|
5. Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology |
3.56 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
6. Learning Management Skills |
3.89 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
Overall Mean |
3.76 |
High Satisfaction |
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
|
|
1. Moral & Ethics |
3.59 |
High Satisfaction |
|
2. Knowledge |
3.57 |
High Satisfaction |
|
3. Cognitive Skills |
3.63 |
High Satisfaction |
|
4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility |
3.91 |
High Satisfaction |
|
5. Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology |
3.75 |
High Satisfaction |
|
6. Learning Management Skills |
3.81 |
High Satisfaction |
|
Overall Mean |
3.71 |
High Satisfaction |
Table 2: Summary of College’s Supervisor Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes
7. The average of the assessment result of all 4 aspects of students’ learning outcomes has to be higher than 3.51
As the data indicated, the average of the assessment results of all aspect of Student’s Learning Outcomes is higher than 3.51 .
School Mentor’s and College’s Supervisor Evaluation Summary of our Senior Students
Table 1: Summary of School Mentor’s Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
|
|
1. Moral & Ethics |
3.81 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
2. Knowledge |
3.93 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
3. Cognitive Skills |
3.67 |
High Satisfaction |
|
4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility |
3.74 |
High Satisfaction |
|
5. Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology |
3.56 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
6. Learning Management Skills |
3.89 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
Overall Mean |
3.76 |
High Satisfaction |
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
|
|
1. Moral & Ethics |
3.59 |
High Satisfaction |
|
2. Knowledge |
3.57 |
High Satisfaction |
|
3. Cognitive Skills |
3.63 |
High Satisfaction |
|
4. Interpersonal skills and responsibility |
3.91 |
High Satisfaction |
|
5. Numerical analysis skills Communication and Use of Information Technology |
3.75 |
High Satisfaction |
|
6. Learning Management Skills |
3.81 |
High Satisfaction |
|
Overall Mean |
3.71 |
High Satisfaction |
Table 2: Summary of College’s Supervisor Evaluation of our Senior Students based on the Program Six (6) Learning Outcomes
Self-Assessment
|
เป้าหมาย |
การดำเนินการ(KPIเชิงคุณภาพให้ระบุข้อ) |
การประเมินตนเอง |
||
|
….5ข้อ…. |
IQA(1-7) |
1-7 |
7 items |
5 |
|
AUN-QA(1-5) |
1(4), 2(4), 3(4) |
5 | ||
Evidence
Self-Assessment
| Self-Assessment | IQA | AUN-QA |
| Indicator 2.1 | 5 | 5 |