Indicator 9.1 Educational Management Results (Output and Outcomes)
For criteria 6 and 7, it is assessed using the Office of Permanent Secretary of Higher Education, Science, Research, and Innovations standards.
| Score 1 | Score 2 | Score 3 | Score 4 | Score 5 |
| Has action 1 item | Has action 2 item | Has action 3-4 item | Has action 5-6 item | Has action 7 item |
AUN-QA based criteria
For AUN-QA, criteria 1 to 6 are assessed at 7 levels.
Performance
1. The pass rate, dropout rate, and average time to graduate are established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.
The program with its pool of advisors closely monitors every student as part of the faculty’s ‘ No Ed Student left behind” to ensure that all students graduate within the target year. The below shows the number of Final year students and the total number of graduates.
| Year | No. Students | TotaL Graduates | % |
| 2019 | 15 | 14 | 93.3 |
| 2020 | 23 | 23 | 100% |
| 2021 | 34 | 34 | 100% |
| 2022 | 21 | 19 | 90.4 % |
2. Employability, self-employment, and advancement to further studies are established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.
One of the strengths, if not the main strength, of our program is the employability of our graduates.
The indicator states that included are the bachelor degree graduates who completed the regular programs of study and are employed or self-employed with a regular income within 1 year of the date compared to the total number of graduates for that academic year.
For the year 2021, our Graduates Employment Rate is 96.88%=5 Marks
The calculation below shows that all of the BEd- English graduates who responded to the survey of the year 2021 were employed or self-employed.
Calculation:
- (Number of Bachelor Graduates who are employed or self-employed within 1 year*100 )/ Total number of Graduate Survey Respondents Total no. Graduates = 34 No. of Graduates who responded = 32 Graduates Employed & Self-employed= 31
31×100/32 = 96.88%
- Percentage of Bachelor Graduates who are employed or self-employed within 1 year*5/100
= ( 96.88*5)/100= 5
3. Research and creative work output and activities carried out by the academic staff and students are established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.
The program encourages students to be independent learners. The teacher and student are encourage to utilize knowledge, ability and experience according to field of responsibility are to produce creative works . The instructor and students of the program have several academic outputs which were showcase during our Academic Expo 2022.
|
Courses |
Creative work/ Academic Output |
|
1. English Teaching 2 |
– Creative Teaching Materials |
|
2. Language Learning through Drama |
– Drama Presentation “ Pinnochiohood” |
|
3. Children Literature |
– Children’s “ BIG” Books |
|
4. Material & IT in Teaching |
– Creative and Interactive Teaching Materials |
|
5. Innovation, IT and Education Technology |
– Interactive Classroom Game |
|
6. Psychology for Teachers |
-Informative Video Campaign on Mental Health |
4. Data are provided to show directly the achievement of the program outcomes, which are established and monitored.
The results of the satisfaction of employers towards our student performance show that program expected learning outcomes are achieve. The faculty has conducted employer’s Satisfaction of our students performance at work. The average score of the survey in the three (3) categories is 4.25 or Very High Satisfaction.
Table 1: Shows the result of the satisfaction of our stakeholders towards our students based on the Six (6 ) Aspects of Learning Outcomes
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
Level |
Evidence |
|
1. Ethical & Moral Devt. |
4.21 |
Very High |
Employers Satisfaction Survey Form |
|
2.Knowledge |
4.24 |
Very High |
|
|
3. Cognitive Skills |
4.12 |
Very High |
|
|
4. Interpersonal Skills |
4.22 |
Very High | |
|
5. Analytical, Communication & IT Skills |
4.22 |
Very High |
|
|
6. Learning Management Skills ( Professional Skills) Total: |
4.23 4.15 |
Very High High Sat |
Table 2: Three (3 ) Aspects of Learner Outcomes in accordance with the ONESQA (Person Learner, Co-Creator, Active (Global) Citizen
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
Satisfaction Level |
|
1. Learner Person |
4.29 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
2.Co-Creator |
4.27 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
3. Active Citizen |
4.17 |
High Satisfaction |
|
Mean |
4.24 |
Very High Satisfaction |
Table 3: English Language and 21st Century Skills
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
Satisfaction Level |
|
1. English Proficiency |
4.56 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
2. 21st Century Skills |
4.35 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
Mean |
4.45 |
Very High Satisfaction |
| 1. TQF2 | 4.15 |
|
2.Three Aspects |
4.24 |
|
3. 21s Century |
4.45 |
|
Mean |
4.25 |
4.21-5.00- Very High Satisfaction
3.41-4.20- High Satisfaction
2.61-3.40-Moderate Satisfaction
1.81-2.60- Low Satisfaction
1.00-1.80- Very Low Satisfaction
5. Satisfaction levels of the various stakeholders are established, monitored, and benchmarked for improvement.
Performance
The faculty has conducted employer’s Satisfaction of our students performance at work. The average score of the survey in the three (3) categories is 4.25 or Very High Satisfaction
- The Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (TQF) has established the preferred characteristics of graduates that are set forth in curricular documents (TQF) 2 and which cover at least 6 aspects of learning outcomes as follows: 1)Ethical and moral development; 2) Knowledge; 3) Cognitive Skills; 4) Interpersonal skills and responsibility; 5) Analytical and communication skills and 6) Learning Management Skill .During the students stay in our college, all activities are designed to meet these competencies. The table below shows the graduates quality assessment: Six (6 ) Aspects of Learning Outcomes
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
Level |
Evidence |
|
1. Ethical & Moral Devt. |
4.21 |
Very High |
Employers Satisfaction Survey Form |
|
2.Knowledge |
4.24 |
Very High |
|
|
3. Cognitive Skills |
4.12 |
Very High |
|
|
4. Interpersonal Skills |
4.22 |
Very High | |
|
5. Analytical, Communication & IT Skills |
4.22 |
Very High |
|
|
6. Learning Management Skills ( Professional Skills) Total: |
4.23 4.15 |
Very High High Sat |
Table 2: Three (3 ) Aspects of Learner Outcomes in accordance with the ONESQA (Person Learner, Co-Creator, Active (Global) Citizen
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
Satisfaction Level |
|
1. Learner Person |
4.29 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
2.Co-Creator |
4.27 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
3. Active Citizen |
4.17 |
High Satisfaction |
|
Mean |
4.24 |
Very High Satisfaction |
Table 3: English Language and 21st Century Skills
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
Satisfaction Level |
|
1. English Proficiency |
4.56 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
2. 21st Century Skills |
4.35 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
Mean |
4.45 |
Very High Satisfaction |
| 1. TQF2 | 4.15 |
|
2.Three Aspects |
4.24 |
|
3. 21s Century |
4.45 |
|
Mean |
4.25 |
4.21-5.00- Very High Satisfaction
3.41-4.20- High Satisfaction
2.61-3.40-Moderate Satisfaction
1.81-2.60- Low Satisfaction
1.00-1.80- Very Low Satisfaction
6. Academic services outcomes / providing local and social benefits are shown.
Academic Service to the community is one of the pillars of our Faculty. For the academic year 2022, the faculty and its students have conducted several academic service to the community:
- English & Math Camp – A Community Service rendered by the Faculty of Education for the Students of Wat Pichittayaram School on February 7, 2023
- English is Fun: English Activity for High School Students conducted at Joseph Maria Building in January 20, 2023
- Friends to Friends: A Collaborative Way of Learning Skills conducted for the students of Debsirinklongsibsam School on
7. Arts and culture learning outcomes are shown.
Arts & Culture Preservation is one the missions of the faculty . Our learning management integrates Arts & Culture Preservation activities to ensure that Arts and Culture Learning outcomes are achieved. Below a re the courses that integrated arts & culture into the teaching & learning:
- Self- Actualization for Teachers- Wai Khru Ceremony
- English Language Teaching 2 – International Day
- Psychology for Teachers – Teacher’s Day Celebration
- Learning English through Drama- Songkran Festival
Moreover, the program also brings the student outside for community integration to develop their understand and appreciation of Arts & Culture. It’s either we invite representative of the community to join us in the celebration and observance of some cultural activities or we bring students to participate to the community.
Self-Assessment
|
Goal |
Performance (Qualitative KPI (items)) |
Self-Assessment |
||
|
…5 item… |
IQA(1-7) |
1,2,3,6,7 |
….5…item |
…4..mark |
|
AUN-QA(1-5) |
7 |
5 |
||
Evidence
| Evidence No. | List of evidences |
| 9.1.1.1 | List of Graduates MIS System Student Profile Student Learning Record |
| 9.1.1.2 | Graduates Employment Record |
| 9.1.1.3 | Faculty of Education Academic Expo Students Creative work/ Academic Output 1. English Teaching 2 – Creative Teaching Materials 2. Language Learning through Drama – Drama Presentation “ Pinnochiohood” 3. Children Literature – Children’s “ BIG” Books 4. Material & IT in Teaching – Creative and Interactive Teaching Materials 5. Innovation, IT and Education Technology – Interactive Classroom Game 6. Psychology for Teachers – Informative Video Campaign on Mental Health |
| 9.1.1.4 | Learning Outcomes: Survey from employers |
| 9.1.1.5 | Stakeholder’s Satisfaction Results |
| 9.1.1.6 | Academic Service to the Community Projects 1. English and Math Camp for a Temple School 2. English is Fun:English Activity for High School Students 3. Friends to Friends: English Activity for H- Students |
| 9.1.1.7 | Arts & Culture Activities 1. Wai Khru Ceremony 2. International Day 3. Teacher’s Day Celebration 4. Songkran Festival 5. Christmas and New Year’s Celebration 6. Cultural Trip to Ayuthaya |
Indicator 9.2 Graduates quality
Performance
- The Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (TQF) has established the preferred characteristics of graduates that are set forth in curricular documents (TQF) 2 and which cover at least 6 aspects of learning outcomes as follows: 1)Ethical and moral development; 2) Knowledge; 3) Cognitive Skills; 4) Interpersonal skills and responsibility; 5) Analytical and communication skills and 6) Learning Management Skill .During the students stay in our college, all activities are designed to meet these competencies. The table below shows the graduates quality assessment:
- Six (6 ) Aspects of Learning Outcomes
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
Level |
Evidence |
|
1. Ethical & Moral Devt. |
4.21 |
Very High |
Employers Satisfaction Survey Form |
|
2.Knowledge |
4.24 |
Very High |
|
|
3. Cognitive Skills |
4.12 |
Very High |
|
|
4. Interpersonal Skills |
4.22 |
Very High | |
|
5. Analytical, Communication & IT Skills |
4.22 |
Very High |
|
|
6. Learning Management Skills ( Professional Skills) Total: |
4.23 4.15 |
Very High High Sat |
Table 2: Three (3 ) Aspects of Learner Outcomes in accordance with the ONESQA (Person Learner, Co-Creator, Active (Global) Citizen
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
Satisfaction Level |
|
1. Learner Person |
4.29 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
2.Co-Creator |
4.27 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
3. Active Citizen |
4.17 |
High Satisfaction |
|
Mean |
4.24 |
Very High Satisfaction |
Table 3: English Language and 21st Century Skills
|
Learning Outcomes |
Mean |
Satisfaction Level |
|
1. English Proficiency |
4.56 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
2. 21st Century Skills |
4.35 |
Very High Satisfaction |
|
Mean |
4.45 |
Very High Satisfaction |
| 1. TQF2 | 4.15 |
|
2.Three Aspects |
4.24 |
|
3. 21s Century |
4.45 |
|
Mean |
4.25 |
4.21-5.00- Very High Satisfaction
3.41-4.20- High Satisfaction
2.61-3.40-Moderate Satisfaction
1.81-2.60- Low Satisfaction
1.00-1.80- Very Low Satisfaction
The average score of the survey in the three (3) categories is 4.25 or Very High Satisfaction
Self-Assessment
|
Goal |
Performance (Qualitative KPI (items)) |
Self-Assessment |
||
|
Percentage … |
IQA(1) |
คะแนนเฉลี่ยผลการประเมินผู้ใช้บัณฑิต |
ผู้ตอบร้อยละ…… |
4.25 mark |
|
AUN-QA(ไม่มี) |
None |
level …none…. |
||
Evidence
| Evidence No. | List of evidences |
| 9.2.1.1 | Graduate Employer’s Satisfaction Results |
Indicator 9.3 Employability/Graduates research output Publications
Performance
One of the strengths, if not the main strength, of our program is the employability of our graduates.
The indicator states that included are the bachelor degree graduates who completed the regular programs of study and are employed or self-employed with a regular income within 1 year of the date compared to the total number of graduates for that academic year.
For the year 2021, our Graduates Employment Rate is 96.88%=5 Marks
The calculation below shows that all of the BEd- English graduates who responded to the survey of the year 2021 were employed or self-employed.
Calculation:
- (Number of Bachelor Graduates who are employed or self-employed within 1 year*100 )/ Total number of Graduate Survey Respondents Total no. Graduates = 34 No. of Graduates who responded = 32 Graduates Employed & Self-employed= 31
31×100/32 = 96.88%
- Percentage of Bachelor Graduates who are employed or self-employed within 1 year*5/100
= ( 96.88*5)/100= 4.844
ตารางแสดงการได้งานทำหรือประกอบอาชีพภายใน 1 ปี (หลักสูตรระดับปริญญาตรี)
| Items | Quantity |
| 1. Total number of Bachelor degree graduates. | 34 |
| 2. The number of Bachelor degree responds to the survey of employment within 1 year after graduation. | 32 |
| 3. The number of Bachelor degree graduates who are employed after graduation (not included self-employed persons) | 27 |
| 4. The number of Bachelor degree graduates who are self-employed. | 4 |
| 5. The number of Bachelor degree graduates who were already employed before studying in the program. | 0 |
| 6. The number of Bachelor degree graduates who continued thesis further studies in graduate Education level. | 0 |
| 7. Salary per month on monthly income of Bachelor degree graduates who were employed on Self-employed (mean) | ………… |
| 8. Satisfaction assessment scores toward graduates quality in accordance with the Thai Qualification framework for Higher Education (mean full score = 5) | …………. |
| 9. Number of Bachelor degree graduates who owned their business with regular incomes. | 4 |
| 10. Number of Bachelor degree graduates who ordained as monks. | 0 |
| 11. Number of Bachelor degree graduates who were drafted into the military. | 0 |
Self-Assessment
|
Goal |
Performance (Qualitative KPI (items)) |
Self-Assessment |
||
|
Percentage… |
IQA(1) Bachelors |
จำนวนผู้มีงานทำใน 1 ปี/จำนวนผู้สำเร็จการศึกษา |
96.88% | 4.844 |
|
Masters/Doctoral |
ผลรวมถ่วงน้ำหนักผลงาน/จำนวนผู้สำเร็จการศึกษา |
Percentage…… |
…..mark |
|
|
AUN-QA(None) |
none |
Level…none…. |
||
Evidence
| Evidence No. | List of evidences |
| 9.3.1.1 | Graduate’s Employment |
Self-Assessment
| Self-Assessment | IQA | AUN-QA |
| Indicator 9.1 | 4 | 5 |
| Indicator 9.2 | 4.25 | 5 |
| Indicator 9.3 | 4.844 | 5 |
| Overall Average score | 4.364 | 5 |